1.
QMUL Graduate Attributes. Published online 2009. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/docs/gacep/38598.pdf
2.
Student Experience, Teaching, Learning and Assessment Strategy (SETLA) 2014 - the next five years. Published online 2014. http://www.arcs.qmul.ac.uk/media/arcs/policyzone/academic/SETLA-Strategy.pdf
3.
TEF Year Two provider submission. https://academicdevelopment.qmul.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/QMTEFYearTwoSubmission_10007775-1.pdf
4.
Kalfa S, Taksa L. Cultural capital in business higher education: reconsidering the graduate attributes movement and the focus on employability. Studies in Higher Education. 2015;40(4):580-595. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.842210
5.
Clarke M. Rethinking graduate employability: the role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education. Published online 23 February 2017:1-15. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152
6.
Quinlan KM. Developing student character through disciplinary curricula: an analysis of UK QAA subject benchmark statements. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41(6):1041-1054. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.966069
7.
Artess, Jane. Employability: A review of the literature 2012-2016. Published online 2017. http://derby.openrepository.com/derby/handle/10545/621285
8.
Gourlay L, Stevenson J. Teaching excellence in higher education: critical perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education. 2017;22(4):391-395. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1304632
9.
Jackson D. Business Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Their Capabilities in Employability Skills. Industry and Higher Education. 2012;26(5):345-356. doi:10.5367/ihe.2012.0117
10.
Hill J, Walkington H, France D. Graduate attributes: implications for higher education practice and policy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2016;40(2):155-163. doi:10.1080/03098265.2016.1154932
11.
de la Harpe B, David C. Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development. 2012;31(4):493-510. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.629361
12.
Mearman A, Guizzo D, Berger S. Is UK economics teaching changing? Evaluating the new subject benchmark statement. Review of Social Economy. 2018;76(3):377-396. doi:10.1080/00346764.2018.1463447
13.
Shahid Yusuf and Kaoru Nabeshima. How Universities Promote Economic Growth. World Bank Publications; 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=459914
14.
Bowl M, Hughes J. Fair access and fee setting in English universities: what do institutional statements suggest about university strategiesin a stratified quasi-market? Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41(2):269-287. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927846
15.
Marginson S. Public/private in higher education: a synthesis of economic and political approaches. Studies in Higher Education. 2018;43(2):322-337. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1168797
16.
Troschitz R, EBSCOhost. Higher Education and the Student: From Welfare State to Neoliberalism. Routledge; 2017. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1517263
17.
Patrick Alan Danaher and Kalwant Bhopal. Identity and Pedagogy in Higher Education : International Comparisons. 1st ed. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1123365
18.
Becher T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education; 1989.
19.
Kreber C. The University and Its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and beyond Disciplinary Boundaries. Routledge; 2008. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9780203892596&uid=^u
20.
Land R, Meyer JHF, Flanagan MT, eds. Threshold Concepts in Practice. Vol volume 68. Sense Publishers; 2016.
21.
Gurung RAR, Chick NL, Haynie A. Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind. 1st ed. Stylus; 2009. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=253660
22.
Shulman LS. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus. 2005;134(3):52-59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
23.
What are threshold concepts and how can they inform medical education? - PubMed - NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609736
24.
Neve H, Wearn A, Collett T. What are threshold concepts and how can they inform medical education? Medical Teacher. 2016;38(8):850-853. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112889
25.
Bhat C, Burm S, Mohan T, Chahine S, Goldszmidt M. What trainees grapple with: a study of threshold concepts on the medicine ward. Medical Education. 2018;52(6):620-631. doi:10.1111/medu.13526
26.
Braine ME, Parnell J. Exploring student’s perceptions and experience of personal tutors. Nurse Education Today. 2011;31(8):904-910. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.005
27.
Teasley ML, Buchanan EM. Capturing the Student Perspective: A New Instrument for Measuring Advising Satisfaction. NACADA Journal. 2013;33(2):4-15. doi:10.12930/NACADA-12-132
28.
McAllister M, Wynaden D, Happell B, et al. Staff experiences of providing support to students who are managing mental health challenges: A qualitative study from two Australian universities. Advances in Mental Health. 2014;12(3):192-201. doi:10.1080/18374905.2014.11081897
29.
Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: a summary of findings and recommendations from the What works? Student Retention & Success programme | Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/building-student-engagement-and-belonging-higher-education-time-change-summary-findings-and
30.
Swecker HK, Fifolt M, Searby L. Academic Advising and First-Generation College Students: A Quantitative Study on Student Retention. NACADA Journal. 2013;33(1):46-53. doi:10.12930/NACADA-13-192
31.
Kyra L. Sutton. Student Satisfaction with Information Provided by Academic Advisors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research. 2011;12(7). http://jstem.org/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1734
32.
Weintraub DS, Sax LJ. The Relationship Between Student–Parent Communication and First-Year Academic Performance. NACADA Journal. 2018;38(1):61-76. doi:10.12930/NACADA-16-045
33.
Lee JA. Affirmation, Support, and Advocacy: Critical Race Theory and Academic Advising. NACADA Journal. 2018;38(1):77-87. doi:10.12930/NACADA-17-028
34.
Wisker G, Exley K, Antoniou M. Working One-to-One with Students: Supervising, Coaching, Mentoring, and Personal Tutoring. Routledge; 2008.
35.
Junco R, Mastrodicasa JM, Aguiar AV, Longnecker EM, Rokkum JN. Impact of Technology-Mediated Communication on Student Evaluations of Advising. NACADA Journal. 2016;36(2):54-66. doi:10.12930/NACADA-16-014
36.
Puroway AW. Critical Advising: A Freirian-Inspired Approach. NACADA Journal. 2016;36(2):4-10. doi:10.12930/NACADA-15-015
37.
Musser T, St. Pierre T, Wilson D, Schwartz M. Experiences of Male Undergraduates That Lead to Academic Failure. NACADA Journal. 2017;37(1):87-98. doi:10.12930/NACADA-15-037
38.
Morgan M. The evolution of student services in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education. Published online 27 February 2012:1-8. doi:10.1080/13603108.2011.652990
39.
Race P. Making Personal Tutoring Work. http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/2817/1/100705.7240.LoRes.pdf
40.
Ronald Barnett. Will to Learn : Being a Student in an Age of Uncertainty. McGraw-Hill Education; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=332672
41.
Stephen DE, O’Connell P, Hall M. ‘Going the extra mile’, ‘fire-fighting’, or laissez-faire? Re-evaluating personal tutoring relationships within mass higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. 2008;13(4):449-460. doi:10.1080/13562510802169749
42.
Myers J. Why support students? Using the past to understand the present. Higher Education Research & Development. 2013;32(4):590-602. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.700509
43.
Millennial Students: Rethinking Time Management. http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View-Articles/Millennial-Students-Rethinking-Time-Management.aspx
44.
Common Factors: A Meta-Model of Academic Advising. http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View-Articles/Common-Factors-A-Meta-Model-of-Academic-Advising.aspx
45.
Pat Folsom, Franklin Yoder, and Jennifer E. Joslin. The New Advisor Guidebook : Mastering the Art of Academic Advising. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4038953
46.
Iatrellis O, Kameas A, Fitsilis P. Academic Advising Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence. Education Sciences. 2017;7(4). doi:10.3390/educsci7040090
47.
Braun J, Zolfagharian M. Student Participation in Academic Advising: Propensity, Behavior, Attribution and Satisfaction. Research in Higher Education. 2016;57(8):968-989. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9414-2
48.
McGill CM. "Cultivating Ways of Thinking”: The Developmental Teaching Perspective in Academic Advising. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development. 2016;28(1):50-54. doi:10.1002/nha3.20131
49.
Spencer J. Small group teaching. The Clinical Teacher. 2009;6(1):56-58. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2008.00265.x
50.
Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Medical education. Published online 3AD. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN145831660&site=eds-live
51.
Laru J, Näykki P, Järvelä S. Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in the higher education context. The Internet and Higher Education. 2012;15(1):29-38. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.004
52.
Mills D, Alexander P. Small-Group Teaching: A Toolkit for Learning. Published online 2013. https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/small_group_teaching_1_1568036632.pdf
53.
Jaques D, Salmon G. Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Face-to-Face and Online Environments. 4th ed. Routledge; 2007. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0616/2006021872.html
54.
Swanson E, McCulley LV, Osman DJ, Scammacca Lewis N, Solis M. The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis. Active Learning in Higher Education. Published online 21 September 2017. doi:10.1177/1469787417731201
55.
Kate Exley and Reg Dennick. Small Group Teaching : Tutorials, Seminars and Beyond. 1st ed. Routledge; 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=181936
56.
Esisi M. Small group teaching. BMJ. Published online 17 November 2010. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6402
57.
Yap R, Moreira A, Wilkins S, Reeves F, Levinson M, McMurrick P. Suturing in Small Group Teaching Settings: a Modification to Peyton’s Four-Step Approach. Medical Science Educator. 2016;26(4):575-580. doi:10.1007/s40670-016-0296-x
58.
Moore F. Peer-led small groups: Are we on the right track? Perspectives on Medical Education. 2017;6(5):325-330. doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0370-0
59.
Hardman J. Tutor–student interaction in seminar teaching: Implications for professional development. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2016;17(1):63-76. doi:10.1177/1469787415616728
60.
Swanson NM, Vaughan AL, Wilkinson BD. First-Year Seminars. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. 2017;18(4):386-400. doi:10.1177/1521025115604811
61.
Leask B. Using Formal and Informal Curricula to Improve Interactions Between Home and International Students. Journal of Studies in International Education. 2009;13(2):205-221. doi:10.1177/1028315308329786
62.
Ottewill R, McFarlane BJ. Effective Learning & Teaching in Business & Management. Kogan Page; 2001.
63.
Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, eds. A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. Fourth edition. Routledge; 2014. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9781315763088&uid=^u
64.
Jaques D, Salmon G. Learning in Groups: A Handbook for Face-to-Face and Online Environments. 4th ed. Routledge; 2007. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0616/2006021872.html
65.
Hockings C, Cooke S, Yamashita H, McGinty S, Bowl M. Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education. 2008;23(2). http://www2.wlv.ac.uk/celt/Projects/RPiEAcademic_Feb08.pdf
66.
Fiechtner SB, Davis EA. Republication of "Why some groups fail. Journal of Management Education. 2016;40(1):12-29. doi:10.1177/1052562915619639
67.
Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning from & with Each Other. Kogan Page; 2001.
68.
Schneider B, Sharma K, Cuendet S, Zufferey G, Dillenbourg P, Pea R. Leveraging mobile eye-trackers to capture joint visual attention in co-located collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. 2018;13(3):241-261. doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9281-2
69.
James P, Hudspeth C. How Do You Take Learning Beyond the Classroom in an Interdisciplinary First-Year Seminar? New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2017;2017(151):79-95. doi:10.1002/tl.20250
70.
Baker JP, Goodboy AK, Bowman ND, Wright AA. Does teaching with PowerPoint increase students’ learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education. 2018;126:376-387. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.003
71.
Lee J, Lim C, Kim H. Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2017;65(2):427-453. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
72.
Gross MM, Wright MC, Anderson OS. Effects of image-based and text-based active learning exercises on student examination performance in a musculoskeletal anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017;10(5):444-455. doi:10.1002/ase.1684
73.
Craig McMillan. From students to scientists: The impact of interactive engagement in lectures. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences. 2018;(13). https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/new-directions/article/view/2425/2432
74.
Gunderman R. Is the Lecture Dead? - The Atlantic. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/01/is-the-lecture-dead/272578/
75.
Lambert C. Twilight of the Lecture. Harvard Magazine. http://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture
76.
Bligh DA. What’s the Use of Lectures? 5th ed. Intellect; 1998.
77.
Heaslip G, Donovan P, Cullen JG. Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2014;15(1):11-24. doi:10.1177/1469787413514648
78.
Marshall K. How to Work the Lecture Hall | Vitae. https://chroniclevitae.com/news/970-how-to-work-the-lecture-hall
79.
Gibbs G. Twenty terrible reasons for lecturing. https://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/resources/20reasons.html
80.
Trengove E. Peer interaction as mechanism for providing timely and accessible feedback to a large undergraduate class. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2017;54(2):119-130. doi:10.1177/0020720916688486
81.
Jyoti Mahantesh Nagmoti. Departing from PowerPoint default mode: Applying Mayer’s multimedia principles for enhanced learning of parasitology. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;35(2). doi:10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_16_251
82.
Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, Wang E, Shapiro MB, DaRosa DA. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Medical Education. 2013;47(4):388-396. doi:10.1111/medu.12127
83.
Hong S, Yu P. Comparison of the effectiveness of two styles of case-based learning implemented in lectures for developing nursing students’ critical thinking ability: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2017;68:16-24. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.12.008
84.
Soneral PAG, Wyse SA. A SCALE-UP Mock-Up: Comparison of Student Learning Gains in High- and Low-Tech Active-Learning Environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2017;16(1). doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0228
85.
Foote K, Knaub A, Henderson C, Dancy M, Beichner RJ. Enabling and challenging factors in institutional reform: The case of SCALE-UP. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH. 12. https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010103#fulltext
86.
Thai NTT, De Wever B, Valcke M. The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best "blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education. 2017;107:113-126. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
87.
Liu C, Chen S, Chi C, Chien KP, Liu Y, Chou TL. The Effects of Clickers With Different Teaching Strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2017;55(5):603-628. doi:10.1177/0735633116674213
88.
Fergusson SJ, Aka JJ, Hennessy CM, et al. Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial. Scottish Medical Journal. 2018;63(1):16-21. doi:10.1177/0036933017741409
89.
Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning | CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/abs/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344
90.
Aricò FR, Lancaster SJ. Facilitating active learning and enhancing student self-assessment skills. International Review of Economics Education. 2018;29:6-13. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2018.06.002
91.
Nielsen KL, Hansen G, Stav JB. Teaching with student response systems (SRS): teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students’ experience of using SRS. Research in Learning Technology. 2013;21. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18989
92.
Winton LM, Ferguson EMN, Hsu CH, et al. Does Self-Assessment Improve the Effectiveness of Grand Rounds Lectures in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital? Journal of Surgical Education. 2016;73(6):968-973. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.014
93.
Shiozawa T, Butz B, Herlan S, Kramer A, Hirt B. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students’ academic performance in applied clinical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2017;10(1):46-52. doi:10.1002/ase.1623
94.
Simcock DC, Chua WH, Hekman M, Levin MT, Brown S. A survey of first-year biology student opinions regarding live lectures and recorded lectures as learning tools. Advances in Physiology Education. 2017;41(1):69-76. doi:10.1152/advan.00117.2016
95.
Scott Cooper. Problem-Solving Modules in Large Introductory Biology Lectures. The American Biology Teacher. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[524:PMILIB]2.0.CO;2
96.
Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2013;38(6):698-712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
97.
Ajjawi R, Boud D. Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. Published online 2 February 2018:1-14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
98.
Pitt E, Norton L. ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2017;42(4):499-516. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
99.
Zimbardi K, Colthorpe K, Dekker A, et al. Are they using my feedback? The extent of students’ feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2017;42(4):625-644. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1174187
100.
Forsythe A, Johnson S. Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2017;42(6):850-859. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1202190
101.
Li LY. ‘Tell me what to do’ vs. ‘guide me through it’: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2011;12(2):101-112. doi:10.1177/1469787411402438
102.
Hughes G. Ipsative Assessment: Motivation through Marking Progress. Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1413/2014415059-t.html
103.
Susan Bloxham and Peter F Boyd. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education : A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill Education; 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=332673
104.
Nicol D, Thomson A, Breslin C. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2014;39(1):102-122. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
105.
Orsmond P, Maw SJ, Park JR, Gomez S, Crook AC. Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2013;38(2):240-252. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
106.
Denton P, McIlroy D. Response of students to statement bank feedback: the impact of assessment literacy on performances in summative tasks. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018;43(2):197-206. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1324017
107.
Sellbjer S. "Have you read my comments? It is not noticeable. Change!” An analysis of feedback given to students who have failed examinations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018;43(2):163-174. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1310801
108.
Ackerman DS, Gross BL. Instructor Feedback: How Much Do Students Really Want? Journal of Marketing Education. 2010;32(2):172-181. doi:10.1177/0273475309360159
109.
Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education. 2006;31(2):219-233. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
110.
Orsmond P, Merry S. Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2011;36(2):125-136. doi:10.1080/02602930903201651
111.
Glover C, Brown E. Written Feedback for Students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education. 2006;7(1):1-16. doi:10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
112.
Busse V. How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2013;22(4):406-424. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005
113.
Duijnhouwer H, Prins FJ, Stokking KM. Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction. 2012;22(3):171-184. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.003
114.
Bryan C, Clegg K. Innovative Assessment in Higher Education. Routledge; 2006. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0516/2005020737.html
115.
Broadbent J, Panadero E, Boud D. Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018;43(2):307-322. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455
116.
Sadler DR. Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35(5):535-550. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015
117.
Price M, Handley K, Millar J, O’Donovan B. Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2010;35(3):277-289. doi:10.1080/02602930903541007
118.
Setyonugroho W, Kennedy KM, Kropmans TJB. Reliability and validity of OSCE checklists used to assess the communication skills of undergraduate medical students: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling. 2015;98(12):1482-1491. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.004
119.
Yiend J, Weller S, Kinchin I. Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2014;38(4):465-484. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2012.726967
120.
Körkkö M, Kyrö-Ämmälä O, Turunen T. Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016;55:198-206. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
121.
Schon DA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner / Donald A. Schon.; 1987.
122.
Leitch R, Day C. Action research and reflective practice: towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research. 2000;8(1):179-193. doi:10.1080/09650790000200108
123.
Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching. 1st ed. SAGE Publications; 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=334515
124.
Hatton N, Smith D. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1995;11(1):33-49. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
125.
Leijen Ä, Allas R, Toom A, et al. Guided Reflection for Supporting the Development of Student Teachers’ Practical Knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;112:314-322. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1170
126.
Potter C. Leadership development: an applied comparison of Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and Scharmer’s Theory U. Industrial and Commercial Training. 2015;47(6):336-342. doi:10.1108/ICT-03-2015-0024
127.
Larrivee B. Transforming Teaching Practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice. 2000;1(3):293-307. doi:10.1080/713693162
128.
Toom A, Husu J, Patrikainen S. Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2015;38(3):320-340. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.943731
129.
Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, Wang E, Shapiro MB, DaRosa DA. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Medical Education. 2013;47(4):388-396. doi:10.1111/medu.12127
130.
Jyoti Mahantesh Nagmoti. Departing from PowerPoint default mode: Applying Mayer’s multimedia principles for enhanced learning of parasitology. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2017;35(2). doi:10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_16_251
131.
Mavromihales M, Holmes V, Racasan R. Game-based learning in mechanical engineering education: Case study of games-based learning application in computer aided design assembly. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. Published online 21 March 2018. doi:10.1177/0306419018762571
132.
HEW KF, LO CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
133.
Baepler P, Walker JD, Driessen M. It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education. 2014;78:227-236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
134.
Roach T. Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education. 2014;17:74-84. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
135.
Chen KS, Monrouxe L, Lu YH, et al. Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta-analysis. Medical Education. 2018;52(9):910-924. doi:10.1111/medu.13616
136.
Hu R, Gao H, Ye Y, Ni Z, Jiang N, Jiang X. Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2018;79:94-103. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.012
137.
Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, et al. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Medical Education. 2011;45(8):818-826. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03988.x
138.
Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, Wang E, Shapiro MB, DaRosa DA. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Medical Education. 2013;47(4):388-396. doi:10.1111/medu.12127
139.
Renkl A, Scheiter K. Studying Visual Displays: How to Instructionally Support Learning. Educational Psychology Review. 2017;29(3):599-621. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9340-4
140.
Pickering JD. Anatomy drawing screencasts: Enabling flexible learning for medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2015;8(3):249-257. doi:10.1002/ase.1480
141.
Lau KHV. Computer-based teaching module design: principles derived from learning theories. Medical Education. 2014;48(3):247-254. doi:10.1111/medu.12357
142.
Graafland M, Dankbaar M, Mert A, et al. How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care. JMIR Serious Games. 2014;2(2). doi:10.2196/games.3825
143.
Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. British Journal of Surgery. 2012;99(10):1322-1330. doi:10.1002/bjs.8819
144.
Germany R, Mulligan B, Roberts DH. Infusing Theory into the Undergraduate Classics Curriculum: Examples from Haverford College’s Senior Seminar, Translation and Transformation, and History of Literary Theory. Classical World. 2015;108(2):221-242. doi:10.1353/clw.2015.0023
145.
Chen CM, Wu CH. Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education. 2015;80:108-121. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
146.
Long T, Logan J, Waugh M. Students’ Perceptions of the Value of Using Videos as a Pre-class Learning Experience in the Flipped Classroom. TechTrends. 2016;60(3):245-252. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
147.
Michaelson LK. Designing Effective Group Activities: Lessons for Classroom Teaching and Faculty Development. Published 1997. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1384&context=podimproveacad
148.
Balslev T, Rasmussen AB, Skajaa T, et al. Combining bimodal presentation schemes and buzz groups improves clinical reasoning and learning at morning report. Medical Teacher. 2015;37(8):759-766. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.986445
149.
Katyal, R. Enhancing student’s learning by introducing various interactive teaching-learning methods in large group. International journal of biomedical and advance research. 2016;(8). http://wt3cf4et2l.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=R&aulast=Katyal&atitle=Enhancing+student%E2%80%99s+learning+by+introducing+various+interactive+teaching-learning+methods+in+large+group&title=International+journal+of+biomedical+and+advance+research&volume=7&issue=8&date=2016&spage=363&issn=2229-3809
150.
Posel N, Mcgee JB, Fleiszer DM. Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases. Medical Teacher. 2015;37(9):813-818. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.993951
151.
Cohen DA, Newman LR, Fishman LN. Twelve tips on writing a discussion case that facilitates teaching and engages learners. Medical Teacher. 2017;39(2):147-152. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1266315
152.
Imai PH, Kresyman S, Asadoorian J. Factors Influencing Dental Educators As They Develop Problem‐Based Learning Cases. Journal of Dental Education. 2016;80(6):731-740. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.6.tb06136.x
153.
Wang J, Ni H, Rui Y, Cui C, Cheng L. A WebGIS-based teaching assistant system for geography field practice (TASGFP). British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016;47(2):279-293. doi:10.1111/bjet.12231
154.
Pawson E, Fournier E, Haigh M, Muniz O, Trafford J, Vajoczki S. Problem-based Learning in Geography: Towards a Critical Assessment of its Purposes, Benefits and Risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2006;30(1):103-116. doi:10.1080/03098260500499709
155.
Pickering JD, Joynes VCT. A holistic model for evaluating the impact of individual technology-enhanced learning resources. Medical Teacher. 2016;38(12):1242-1247. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1210112
156.
Duffy RM, Guerandel A, Casey P, Malone K, Kelly BD. Experiences of Using Prezi in Psychiatry Teaching. Academic Psychiatry. 2015;39(6):615-619. doi:10.1007/s40596-014-0204-x
157.
Kirsten Zimbardi. Using Inquiry-based Practicals to Promote Students’ Critical Evaluation of the Scientific Literature and Maturation of their Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International). 2016;23(5). https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/10658
158.
Alexandra Yeung. Invigorating science practicals using an inquiry orientated pedagogical tool. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference). Published online 2015. https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/9105
159.
Reid S, Shapiro L, Louw G. How Haptics and Drawing Enhance the Learning of Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. Published online 14 August 2018. doi:10.1002/ase.1807
160.
Cho D, Cosimini M, Espinoza J. Podcasting in medical education: a review of the literature. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 2017;29(4):229-239. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.69
161.
Davies C. Learning and Teaching in Laboratories: An Engineering Subject Centre Guide. Published online 2008. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/learning-teaching-labs.pdf
162.
Kreber C. The University and Its Disciplines: Teaching and Learning within and beyond Disciplinary Boundaries. Routledge; 2008. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9780203892596&uid=^u
163.
Becher T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Society for Research into Higher Education; 1989.
164.
Shulman LS. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus. 2005;134(3):52-59. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
165.
Gurung RAR, Chick NL, Haynie A. Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits of Mind. 1st ed. Stylus; 2009. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=253660
166.
Nancy L. Chick, Aeron Haynie, Regan A. R. Gurung. Exploring More Signature Pedagogies. Stylus Pub.; 2012.
167.
Middendorf J, Pace D. Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 2004;2004(98):1-12. doi:10.1002/tl.142
168.
Jessop T, Maleckar B. The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: a comparative study. Studies in Higher Education. 2016;41(4):696-711. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.943170
169.
Land R, Meyer JHF, Flanagan MT, eds. Threshold Concepts in Practice. Vol volume 68. Sense Publishers; 2016.
170.
Ottewill R, McFarlane BJ. Effective Learning & Teaching in Business & Management. Kogan Page; 2001.
171.
Martensson P, Bild M, Nilsson K. Teaching and Learning at Business Schools: Transforming Business Education. Gower; 2008.
172.
Findlay-Thompson, Sandi. Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom in an Undergraduate Business Course. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2331035
173.
Eckmann J. Law School Teaching: Linking Learning with Law Practice. Legal education review. Published online 2004:257-268. http://wt3cf4et2l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Law+School+Teaching%3A+Linking+Learning+with+Law+Practice&rft.jtitle=Legal+Education+Review&rft.au=Eckmann%2C+James+K&rft.date=2004&rft.issn=1033-2839&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=268&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=894780580128516&paramdict=en-US
174.
Burridge R, Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (Great Britain). Effective Learning & Teaching in Law. Kogan Page; 2002.
175.
Klink B van, Vries URMTh de, eds. Academic Learning in Law: Theoretical Positions, Teaching Experiments and Learning Experiences. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2016.
176.
Bamford D. Learning the ‘How’ of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education. Osgoode Hall law journal (1960). Published online 10AD. http://wt3cf4et2l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning+the+%27How%27+of+the+Law%3A+Teaching+Procedure+and+Legal+Education&rft.jtitle=Osgoode+Hall+Law+Journal&rft.au=David+Bamford&rft.au=Trevor+C+W+Farrow&rft.au=Michael+Karayanni&rft.au=Erik+S+Knutsen&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.pub=Osgoode+Hall+Law+School+of+York+University&rft.issn=0030-6185&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.externalDocID=3325608141&paramdict=en-US
177.
Knights B. Intelligence and Interrogation: The identity of the English student. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2005;4(1):33-52. doi:10.1177/1474022205048757
178.
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. doi:10.1177/1474022216628303#
179.
Alder E. Becoming a student of English: Students’ experiences of transition into the first year. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2018;17(2):185-203. doi:10.1177/1474022216628303
180.
Milthorpe N, Clarke R, Fletcher L, Moore R, Stark H. Blended English: Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in English literary studies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2018;17(3):345-365. doi:10.1177/1474022217722140
181.
Cunningham C. Teaching and learning French – A tale of desire in the humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2017;16(2):127-140. doi:10.1177/1474022215599165
182.
Dörnyei Z, Malderez A. Group dynamics and foreign language teaching. System. 1997;25(1):65-81. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061-9
183.
Effective Learning and Teaching in Modern Languages. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis Group; 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=214776
184.
Calder L. Uncoverage: Toward a Signature Pedagogy for the History Survey. Journal of American History. 2006;92(4):1358-1370. doi:10.2307/4485896
185.
Gannon K. Getting Medieval with Team-Based Learning � The Tattooed Professor. http://www.thetattooedprof.com/archives/449
186.
Middendorf J, Mickute J, Saunders T, Najar J, Clark-Huckstep AE, Pace D. What’s feeling got to do with it? Decoding emotional bottlenecks in the history classroom. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2015;14(2):166-180. doi:10.1177/1474022214552655
187.
Booth A, Ludvigsson D. Tuning history. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. Published online 9 January 2017. doi:10.1177/1474022216686507
188.
Geoff Timmins, Keith Vernon, and Christine Kinealy. Teaching and Learning History. 1st ed. SAGE Publications; 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=456719
189.
Alan Booth. Teaching History at University : Enhancing Learning and Understanding. Routledge; 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1517699
190.
Fyfe A. Uncomfortable departments: British historians of science and the importance of disciplinary communities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2015;14(2):194-205. doi:10.1177/1474022214549438
191.
Poletti A, Seaboyer J, Kennedy R, Barnett T, Douglas K. The affects of not reading: Hating characters, being bored, feeling stupid. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 2016;15(2):231-247. doi:10.1177/1474022214556898
192.
Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching. 1st ed. SAGE Publications; 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=334515
193.
Kinchin IM, Francis RA. Mapping pedagogic frailty in geography education: a framed autoethnographic case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2017;41(1):56-74. doi:10.1080/03098265.2016.1241988
194.
Pawson E, Fournier E, Haigh M, Muniz O, Trafford J, Vajoczki S. Problem-based Learning in Geography: Towards a Critical Assessment of its Purposes, Benefits and Risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 2006;30(1):103-116. doi:10.1080/03098260500499709
195.
Journal of Geography in Higher Education: Vol 42, No 1. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjgh20/current
196.
Kahn PB, Kyle J, Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (Great Britain). Effective Learning and Teaching in Mathematics and Its Applications. Kogan Page; 2002.
197.
Lo CK, Hew KF, Chen G. Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review. 2017;22:50-73. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
198.
HERSAM MC, LUNA M, LIGHT G. Implementation of Interdisciplinary Group Learning and Peer Assessment in a Nanotechnology Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education. 2004;93(1):49-57. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00787.x
199.
Holmes NG, Wieman CE. Introductory physics labs: We can do better. Physics Today. 2018;71(1):38-45. doi:10.1063/PT.3.3816
200.
Arthur P, Ludwig M, Castelli J, Kirkwood P, Attwood P. Prepare, Do, Review: A skills-based approach for laboratory practical classes in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2016;44(3):276-287. doi:10.1002/bmb.20951
201.
Cooper MM, Stowe RL. Chemistry Education Research—From Personal Empiricism to Evidence, Theory, and Informed Practice. Chemical Reviews. 2018;118(12):6053-6087. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00020
202.
Bill Lucas. Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). 2016;6(2):4-13. http://journals.sfu.ca/onlinejour/index.php/i-jep/article/view/5366
203.
Dolan EL. Undergraduate research as curriculum. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2017;45(4):293-298. doi:10.1002/bmb.21070
204.
Santas AJ. Reciprocity within biochemistry and biology service-learning. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2009;37(3):143-151. doi:10.1002/bmb.20291
205.
Young JM, Shepardson DP. Using Q methodology to investigate undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the geosciences. Science Education. 2018;102(1):195-214. doi:10.1002/sce.21320
206.
Hanh NV, Hop NH. The effectiveness of the industrial field trip in introduction to engineering: A case study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. Published online 27 April 2018. doi:10.1177/0020720918773050
207.
Rubner G. First-year undergraduate teaching of electrical and electronic engineering: innovation and inspiration. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2017;54(4):281-282. doi:10.1177/0020720917694997
208.
Cavalcanti J, Figueredo LF, Ishihara JY, et al. A real-time web-based networked control system education platform. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2018;55(2):130-141. doi:10.1177/0020720917750952
209.
Twigg P, Ponnapalli P, Fowler M. Workshop problem-solving for improved student engagement and increased learning in Engineering Control. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2018;55(2):120-129. doi:10.1177/0020720918756258
210.
Coppens P, Van den Bossche J, De Cock M. Student understanding of phase shifts, frequency and Bode plots. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2017;54(3):247-261. doi:10.1177/0020720916680373
211.
Judge M. Large-scale Laboratory Teaching for 1st Year EEE Undergraduates. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education. 2017;54(2):164-177. doi:10.1177/0020720916688487
212.
Mavromihales M, Holmes V, Racasan R. Game-based learning in mechanical engineering education: Case study of games-based learning application in computer aided design assembly. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. Published online 21 March 2018. doi:10.1177/0306419018762571
213.
Heywood J. The Asssessment of Learning in Engineering Education: Practice and Policy. IEEE Press; 2016. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=7461000
214.
Odeh S, McKenna S, Abu-Mulaweh H. A unified first-year engineering design-based learning course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. 2017;45(1):47-58. doi:10.1177/0306419016674508
215.
Tian ZF. Teaching and enhancement of critical thinking skills for undergraduate students in a computational fluid dynamics course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. 2017;45(1):76-88. doi:10.1177/0306419016674133
216.
Mariasiu F, Raboca HM. Assessment of extracurricular activities’ effects on automotive engineering education: A cross-national study. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education. 2017;45(2):120-141. doi:10.1177/0306419016674144
217.
Kim M, Diong CH, ProQuest (Firm). Biology Education for Social and Sustainable Development. Sense Publishers; 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3034747
218.
Letchford J, Corradi H, Day T. A flexible e-learning resource promoting the critical reading of scientific papers for science undergraduates. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2017;45(6):483-490. doi:10.1002/bmb.21072
219.
Cubas Rolim E, Martins de Oliveira J, Dalvi LT, et al. Blog construction as an effective tool in biochemistry active learning. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2017;45(3):205-215. doi:10.1002/bmb.21028
220.
Goff EE, Reindl KM, Johnson C, et al. Variation in external representations as part of the classroom lecture:An investigation of virtual cell animations in introductory photosynthesis instruction*. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2017;45(3):226-234. doi:10.1002/bmb.21032
221.
Eberlein T, Kampmeier J, Minderhout V, et al. Pedagogies of engagement in science. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2008;36(4):262-273. doi:10.1002/bmb.20204
222.
Thaman R, Dillon S, Saggar S, Gupta M, Kaur H. Promoting active learning in respiratory physiology – Positive student perception and improved outcomes. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2013;3(1):27-34.
223.
Cantillon P, Wood D. ABC of Learning and Teaching in Medicine. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9781444323238&uid=^u
224.
McKimm J, Swanick T. Clinical Teaching Made Easy: A Practical Guide to Teaching and Learning in Clinical Settings. Quay; 2010.
225.
Bleakley A. Pre-registration house officers and ward-based learning: a `new apprenticeship’ model. Medical Education. 2002;36(1):9-15. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01128.x
226.
Egan T, Jaye C. Communities of clinical practice: the social organization of clinical learning. Health:. 2009;13(1):107-125. doi:10.1177/1363459308097363
227.
Launer J. Managing the threat to reflective writing. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2018;94(1111):314-315. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135753
228.
Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Teaching professionalism in medical education: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25. Medical Teacher. 2013;35(7):e1252-e1266. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.789132
229.
Rivière E, Saucier D, Lafleur A, Lacasse M, Chiniara G. Twelve tips for efficient procedural simulation. Medical Teacher. Published online 24 October 2017:1-9. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1391375
230.
Losco CD, Grant WD, Armson A, Meyer AJ, Walker BF. Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. Medical Teacher. 2017;39(3):234-243. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1271944
231.
Ellaway RH, O’Gorman L, Strasser R, et al. A critical hybrid realist-outcomes systematic review of relationships between medical education programmes and communities: BEME Guide No. 35. Medical Teacher. 2016;38(3):229-245. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112894
232.
Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, et al. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32. Medical Teacher. 2015;37(7):611-630. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1032918
233.
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher. 2013;35(10):e1511-e1530. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
234.
Fatmi M, Hartling L, Hillier T, Campbell S, Oswald AE. The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Medical Teacher. 2013;35(12):e1608-e1624. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802
235.
Braeckman L, ‘t Kint L, Bekaert M, Cobbaut L, Janssens H. Comparison of two case-based learning conditions with real patients in teaching occupational medicine. Medical Teacher. 2014;36(4):340-346. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.887833
236.
Merritt C, Munzer BW, Wolff M, Santen SA. Not Another Bedside Lecture: Active Learning Techniques for Clinical Instruction. AEM Education and Training. 2018;2(1):48-50. doi:10.1002/aet2.10069
237.
Mac Giolla Phadraig C, Nunn JH, Tornsey O, Timms M. Does Special Care Dentistry undergraduate teaching improve dental student attitudes towards people with disabilities? European Journal of Dental Education. 2015;19(2):107-112. doi:10.1111/eje.12110
238.
Cameron DA, Binnie VI, Sherriff A, Bissell V. Peer assisted learning: teaching dental skills and enhancing graduate attributes. British Dental Journal. 2015;219(6):267-272. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.722
239.
Beveridge E. Learning from patients. BMJ. 2007;334(7592):s83.2-s84. doi:10.1136/bmj.334.7592.s83-a
240.
Gamble Blakey A, Golding C. ‘Of Course They’re Bloody Scared!’ Managing Medical Student Fear to Better Cultivate Thinking. Medical Science Educator. 2018;28(1):165-173. doi:10.1007/s40670-017-0524-z
