1
QMUL Graduate Attributes. 2009.https://www.qmul.ac.uk/docs/gacep/38598.pdf
2
Student Experience, Teaching, Learning and Assessment Strategy (SETLA) 2014 - the next five years. 2014.http://www.arcs.qmul.ac.uk/media/arcs/policyzone/academic/SETLA-Strategy.pdf
3
TEF Year Two provider submission. https://academicdevelopment.qmul.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/QMTEFYearTwoSubmission_10007775-1.pdf
4
Kalfa S, Taksa L. Cultural capital in business higher education: reconsidering the graduate attributes movement and the focus on employability. Studies in Higher Education 2015;40:580–95. doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.842210
5
Clarke M. Rethinking graduate employability: the role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education 2017;:1–15. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1294152
6
Quinlan KM. Developing student character through disciplinary curricula: an analysis of UK QAA subject benchmark statements. Studies in Higher Education 2016;41:1041–54. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.966069
7
Artess, Jane. Employability: A review of the literature 2012-2016. Published Online First: 2017.http://derby.openrepository.com/derby/handle/10545/621285
8
Gourlay L, Stevenson J. Teaching excellence in higher education: critical perspectives. Teaching in Higher Education 2017;22:391–5. doi:10.1080/13562517.2017.1304632
9
Jackson D. Business Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Their Capabilities in Employability Skills. Industry and Higher Education 2012;26:345–56. doi:10.5367/ihe.2012.0117
10
Hill J, Walkington H, France D. Graduate attributes: implications for higher education practice and policy. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 2016;40:155–63. doi:10.1080/03098265.2016.1154932
11
de la Harpe B, David C. Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes. Higher Education Research & Development 2012;31:493–510. doi:10.1080/07294360.2011.629361
12
Mearman A, Guizzo D, Berger S. Is UK economics teaching changing? Evaluating the new subject benchmark statement. Review of Social Economy 2018;76:377–96. doi:10.1080/00346764.2018.1463447
13
Shahid Yusuf and Kaoru Nabeshima. How Universities Promote Economic Growth. World Bank Publications 2006. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=459914
14
Bowl M, Hughes J. Fair access and fee setting in English universities: what do institutional statements suggest about university strategiesin a stratified quasi-market? Studies in Higher Education 2016;41:269–87. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927846
15
Marginson S. Public/private in higher education: a synthesis of economic and political approaches. Studies in Higher Education 2018;43:322–37. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1168797
16
Troschitz R, EBSCOhost. Higher education and the student: from welfare state to neoliberalism. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2017. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1517263
17
Patrick Alan Danaher and Kalwant Bhopal. Identity and Pedagogy in Higher Education : International Comparisons. 1st ed. Bloomsbury Publishing PLC 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1123365
18
Becher T. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: : Society for Research into Higher Education 1989.
19
Kreber C. The university and its disciplines: teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. New York: : Routledge 2008. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9780203892596&uid=^u
20
Land R, Meyer JHF, Flanagan MT, editors. Threshold concepts in practice. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: : Sense Publishers 2016.
21
Gurung RAR, Chick NL, Haynie A. Exploring signature pedagogies: approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. 1st ed. Sterling, Va: : Stylus 2009. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=253660
22
Shulman LS. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 2005;134:52–9. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
23
What are threshold concepts and how can they inform medical education? - PubMed - NCBI. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26609736
24
Neve H, Wearn A, Collett T. What are threshold concepts and how can they inform medical education? Medical Teacher 2016;38:850–3. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112889
25
Bhat C, Burm S, Mohan T, et al. What trainees grapple with: a study of threshold concepts on the medicine ward. Medical Education 2018;52:620–31. doi:10.1111/medu.13526
26
Braine ME, Parnell J. Exploring student’s perceptions and experience of personal tutors. Nurse Education Today 2011;31:904–10. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2011.01.005
27
Teasley ML, Buchanan EM. Capturing the Student Perspective: A New Instrument for Measuring Advising Satisfaction. NACADA Journal 2013;33:4–15. doi:10.12930/NACADA-12-132
28
McAllister M, Wynaden D, Happell B, et al. Staff experiences of providing support to students who are managing mental health challenges: A qualitative study from two Australian universities. Advances in Mental Health 2014;12:192–201. doi:10.1080/18374905.2014.11081897
29
Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: a summary of findings and recommendations from the What works? Student Retention & Success programme | Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resource/building-student-engagement-and-belonging-higher-education-time-change-summary-findings-and
30
Swecker HK, Fifolt M, Searby L. Academic Advising and First-Generation College Students: A Quantitative Study on Student Retention. NACADA Journal 2013;33:46–53. doi:10.12930/NACADA-13-192
31
Kyra L. Sutton. Student Satisfaction with Information Provided by Academic Advisors. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research 2011;12.http://jstem.org/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1734
32
Weintraub DS, Sax LJ. The Relationship Between Student–Parent Communication and First-Year Academic Performance. NACADA Journal 2018;38:61–76. doi:10.12930/NACADA-16-045
33
Lee JA. Affirmation, Support, and Advocacy: Critical Race Theory and Academic Advising. NACADA Journal 2018;38:77–87. doi:10.12930/NACADA-17-028
34
Wisker G, Exley K, Antoniou M. Working one-to-one with students: supervising, coaching, mentoring, and personal tutoring. Abingdon: : Routledge 2008.
35
Junco R, Mastrodicasa JM, Aguiar AV, et al. Impact of Technology-Mediated Communication on Student Evaluations of Advising. NACADA Journal 2016;36:54–66. doi:10.12930/NACADA-16-014
36
Puroway AW. Critical Advising: A Freirian-Inspired Approach. NACADA Journal 2016;36:4–10. doi:10.12930/NACADA-15-015
37
Musser T, St. Pierre T, Wilson D, et al. Experiences of Male Undergraduates That Lead to Academic Failure. NACADA Journal 2017;37:87–98. doi:10.12930/NACADA-15-037
38
Morgan M. The evolution of student services in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education 2012;:1–8. doi:10.1080/13603108.2011.652990
39
Race P. Making Personal Tutoring Work. http://eprints.leedsbeckett.ac.uk/2817/1/100705.7240.LoRes.pdf
40
Ronald Barnett. Will to Learn : Being a Student in an Age of Uncertainty. McGraw-Hill Education 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=332672
41
Stephen DE, O’Connell P, Hall M. ‘Going the extra mile’, ‘fire-fighting’, or laissez-faire? Re-evaluating personal tutoring relationships within mass higher education. Teaching in Higher Education 2008;13:449–60. doi:10.1080/13562510802169749
42
Myers J. Why support students? Using the past to understand the present. Higher Education Research & Development 2013;32:590–602. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.700509
43
Millennial Students: Rethinking Time Management. http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View-Articles/Millennial-Students-Rethinking-Time-Management.aspx
44
Common Factors: A Meta-Model of Academic Advising. http://www.nacada.ksu.edu/Resources/Academic-Advising-Today/View-Articles/Common-Factors-A-Meta-Model-of-Academic-Advising.aspx
45
Pat Folsom, Franklin Yoder, and Jennifer E. Joslin. The New Advisor Guidebook : Mastering the Art of Academic Advising. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated 2015. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=4038953
46
Iatrellis O, Kameas A, Fitsilis P. Academic Advising Systems: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Evidence. Education Sciences 2017;7. doi:10.3390/educsci7040090
47
Braun J, Zolfagharian M. Student Participation in Academic Advising: Propensity, Behavior, Attribution and Satisfaction. Research in Higher Education 2016;57:968–89. doi:10.1007/s11162-016-9414-2
48
McGill CM. "Cultivating Ways of Thinking”: The Developmental Teaching Perspective in Academic Advising. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development 2016;28:50–4. doi:10.1002/nha3.20131
49
Spencer J. Small group teaching. The Clinical Teacher 2009;6:56–8. doi:10.1111/j.1743-498X.2008.00265.x
50
Student perceptions of effective small group teaching. Medical education Published Online First: 3AD.http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsbl&AN=RN145831660&site=eds-live
51
Laru J, Näykki P, Järvelä S. Supporting small-group learning using multiple Web 2.0 tools: A case study in the higher education context. The Internet and Higher Education 2012;15:29–38. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.08.004
52
Mills D, Alexander P. Small-Group Teaching: A Toolkit for Learning. 2013.https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets.creode.advancehe-document-manager/documents/hea/private/resources/small_group_teaching_1_1568036632.pdf
53
Jaques D, Salmon G. Learning in groups: a handbook for face-to-face and online environments. 4th ed. Abingdon, N.Y.: : Routledge 2007. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0616/2006021872.html
54
Swanson E, McCulley LV, Osman DJ, et al. The effect of team-based learning on content knowledge: A meta-analysis. Active Learning in Higher Education Published Online First: 21 September 2017. doi:10.1177/1469787417731201
55
Kate Exley and Reg Dennick. Small Group Teaching : Tutorials, Seminars and Beyond. 1st ed. Routledge 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=181936
56
Esisi M. Small group teaching. BMJ Published Online First: 17 November 2010. doi:10.1136/bmj.c6402
57
Yap R, Moreira A, Wilkins S, et al. Suturing in Small Group Teaching Settings: a Modification to Peyton’s Four-Step Approach. Medical Science Educator 2016;26:575–80. doi:10.1007/s40670-016-0296-x
58
Moore F. Peer-led small groups: Are we on the right track? Perspectives on Medical Education 2017;6:325–30. doi:10.1007/s40037-017-0370-0
59
Hardman J. Tutor–student interaction in seminar teaching: Implications for professional development. Active Learning in Higher Education 2016;17:63–76. doi:10.1177/1469787415616728
60
Swanson NM, Vaughan AL, Wilkinson BD. First-Year Seminars. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice 2017;18:386–400. doi:10.1177/1521025115604811
61
Leask B. Using Formal and Informal Curricula to Improve Interactions Between Home and International Students. Journal of Studies in International Education 2009;13:205–21. doi:10.1177/1028315308329786
62
Ottewill R, McFarlane BJ. Effective learning & teaching in business & management. London: : Kogan Page 2001.
63
Fry H, Ketteridge S, Marshall S, editors. A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education: enhancing academic practice. Fourth edition. London: : Routledge 2014. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9781315763088&uid=^u
64
Jaques D, Salmon G. Learning in groups: a handbook for face-to-face and online environments. 4th ed. Abingdon, N.Y.: : Routledge 2007. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0616/2006021872.html
65
Hockings C, Cooke S, Yamashita H, et al. Switched off? A study of disengagement among computing students at two universities. Research Papers in Education 2008;23.http://www2.wlv.ac.uk/celt/Projects/RPiEAcademic_Feb08.pdf
66
Fiechtner SB, Davis EA. Republication of "Why some groups fail. Journal of Management Education 2016;40:12–29. doi:10.1177/1052562915619639
67
Boud D, Cohen R, Sampson J. Peer learning in higher education: learning from & with each other. London: : Kogan Page 2001.
68
Schneider B, Sharma K, Cuendet S, et al. Leveraging mobile eye-trackers to capture joint visual attention in co-located collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 2018;13:241–61. doi:10.1007/s11412-018-9281-2
69
James P, Hudspeth C. How Do You Take Learning Beyond the Classroom in an Interdisciplinary First-Year Seminar? New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2017;2017:79–95. doi:10.1002/tl.20250
70
Baker JP, Goodboy AK, Bowman ND, et al. Does teaching with PowerPoint increase students’ learning? A meta-analysis. Computers & Education 2018;126:376–87. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.003
71
Lee J, Lim C, Kim H. Development of an instructional design model for flipped learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development 2017;65:427–53. doi:10.1007/s11423-016-9502-1
72
Gross MM, Wright MC, Anderson OS. Effects of image-based and text-based active learning exercises on student examination performance in a musculoskeletal anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education 2017;10:444–55. doi:10.1002/ase.1684
73
Craig McMillan. From students to scientists: The impact of interactive engagement in lectures. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences Published Online First: 2018.https://journals.le.ac.uk/ojs1/index.php/new-directions/article/view/2425/2432
74
Gunderman R. Is the Lecture Dead? - The Atlantic. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/01/is-the-lecture-dead/272578/
75
Lambert C. Twilight of the Lecture. Harvard Magazinehttp://harvardmagazine.com/2012/03/twilight-of-the-lecture
76
Bligh DA. What’s the use of lectures? 5th ed. Exeter: : Intellect 1998.
77
Heaslip G, Donovan P, Cullen JG. Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education 2014;15:11–24. doi:10.1177/1469787413514648
78
Marshall K. How to Work the Lecture Hall | Vitae. https://chroniclevitae.com/news/970-how-to-work-the-lecture-hall
79
Gibbs G. Twenty terrible reasons for lecturing. https://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsld/resources/20reasons.html
80
Trengove E. Peer interaction as mechanism for providing timely and accessible feedback to a large undergraduate class. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2017;54:119–30. doi:10.1177/0020720916688486
81
Jyoti Mahantesh Nagmoti. Departing from PowerPoint default mode: Applying Mayer’s multimedia principles for enhanced learning of parasitology. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2017;35. doi:10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_16_251
82
Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, et al. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Medical Education 2013;47:388–96. doi:10.1111/medu.12127
83
Hong S, Yu P. Comparison of the effectiveness of two styles of case-based learning implemented in lectures for developing nursing students’ critical thinking ability: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2017;68:16–24. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.12.008
84
Soneral PAG, Wyse SA. A SCALE-UP Mock-Up: Comparison of Student Learning Gains in High- and Low-Tech Active-Learning Environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education 2017;16. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-07-0228
85
Foote K, Knaub A, Henderson C, et al. Enabling and challenging factors in institutional reform: The case of SCALE-UP. PHYSICAL REVIEW PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH;12.https://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010103#fulltext
86
Thai NTT, De Wever B, Valcke M. The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best "blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education 2017;107:113–26. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.003
87
Liu C, Chen S, Chi C, et al. The Effects of Clickers With Different Teaching Strategies. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2017;55:603–28. doi:10.1177/0735633116674213
88
Fergusson SJ, Aka JJ, Hennessy CM, et al. Examining the impact of audience response systems on student performance in anatomy education: a randomised controlled trial. Scottish Medical Journal 2018;63:16–21. doi:10.1177/0036933017741409
89
Enhancing Diversity in Undergraduate Science: Self-Efficacy Drives Performance Gains with Active Learning | CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/abs/10.1187/cbe.16-12-0344
90
Aricò FR, Lancaster SJ. Facilitating active learning and enhancing student self-assessment skills. International Review of Economics Education 2018;29:6–13. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2018.06.002
91
Nielsen KL, Hansen G, Stav JB. Teaching with student response systems (SRS): teacher-centric aspects that can negatively affect students’ experience of using SRS. Research in Learning Technology 2013;21. doi:10.3402/rlt.v21i0.18989
92
Winton LM, Ferguson EMN, Hsu C-H, et al. Does Self-Assessment Improve the Effectiveness of Grand Rounds Lectures in a Community-Based Teaching Hospital? Journal of Surgical Education 2016;73:968–73. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.014
93
Shiozawa T, Butz B, Herlan S, et al. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students’ academic performance in applied clinical anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education 2017;10:46–52. doi:10.1002/ase.1623
94
Simcock DC, Chua WH, Hekman M, et al. A survey of first-year biology student opinions regarding live lectures and recorded lectures as learning tools. Advances in Physiology Education 2017;41:69–76. doi:10.1152/advan.00117.2016
95
Scott Cooper. Problem-Solving Modules in Large Introductory Biology Lectures. The American Biology Teacher doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[524:PMILIB]2.0.CO;2
96
Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2013;38:698–712. doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
97
Ajjawi R, Boud D. Examining the nature and effects of feedback dialogue. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2018;:1–14. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1434128
98
Pitt E, Norton L. ‘Now that’s the feedback I want!’ Students’ reactions to feedback on graded work and what they do with it. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2017;42:499–516. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1142500
99
Zimbardi K, Colthorpe K, Dekker A, et al. Are they using my feedback? The extent of students’ feedback use has a large impact on subsequent academic performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2017;42:625–44. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1174187
100
Forsythe A, Johnson S. Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2017;42:850–9. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1202190
101
Li LY. ‘Tell me what to do’ vs. ‘guide me through it’: Feedback experiences of international doctoral students. Active Learning in Higher Education 2011;12:101–12. doi:10.1177/1469787411402438
102
Hughes G. Ipsative assessment: motivation through marking progress. Houndmills, Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2014. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy1413/2014415059-t.html
103
Susan Bloxham and Peter F Boyd. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education : A Practical Guide. McGraw-Hill Education 2007. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=332673
104
Nicol D, Thomson A, Breslin C. Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2014;39:102–22. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.795518
105
Orsmond P, Maw SJ, Park JR, et al. Moving feedback forward: theory to practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2013;38:240–52. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.625472
106
Denton P, McIlroy D. Response of students to statement bank feedback: the impact of assessment literacy on performances in summative tasks. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2018;43:197–206. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1324017
107
Sellbjer S. "Have you read my comments? It is not noticeable. Change!” An analysis of feedback given to students who have failed examinations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2018;43:163–74. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1310801
108
Ackerman DS, Gross BL. Instructor Feedback: How Much Do Students Really Want? Journal of Marketing Education 2010;32:172–81. doi:10.1177/0273475309360159
109
Carless D. Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education 2006;31:219–33. doi:10.1080/03075070600572132
110
Orsmond P, Merry S. Feedback alignment: effective and ineffective links between tutors’ and students’ understanding of coursework feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2011;36:125–36. doi:10.1080/02602930903201651
111
Glover C, Brown E. Written Feedback for Students: too much, too detailed or too incomprehensible to be effective? Bioscience Education 2006;7:1–16. doi:10.3108/beej.2006.07000004
112
Busse V. How do students of German perceive feedback practices at university? A motivational exploration. Journal of Second Language Writing 2013;22:406–24. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2013.09.005
113
Duijnhouwer H, Prins FJ, Stokking KM. Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students’ writing motivation, process, and performance. Learning and Instruction 2012;22:171–84. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.10.003
114
Bryan C, Clegg K. Innovative assessment in higher education. New York: : Routledge 2006. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0516/2005020737.html
115
Broadbent J, Panadero E, Boud D. Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: a case study in a large class. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2018;43:307–22. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455
116
Sadler DR. Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2010;35:535–50. doi:10.1080/02602930903541015
117
Price M, Handley K, Millar J, et al. Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 2010;35:277–89. doi:10.1080/02602930903541007
118
Setyonugroho W, Kennedy KM, Kropmans TJB. Reliability and validity of OSCE checklists used to assess the communication skills of undergraduate medical students: A systematic review. Patient Education and Counseling 2015;98:1482–91. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.004
119
Yiend J, Weller S, Kinchin I. Peer observation of teaching: The interaction between peer review and developmental models of practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education 2014;38:465–84. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2012.726967
120
Körkkö M, Kyrö-Ämmälä O, Turunen T. Professional development through reflection in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 2016;55:198–206. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.014
121
Schon DA. Educating the reflective practitioner / Donald A. Schon. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass: 1987.
122
Leitch R, Day C. Action research and reflective practice: towards a holistic view. Educational Action Research 2000;8:179–93. doi:10.1080/09650790000200108
123
Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching. 1st ed. SAGE Publications 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=334515
124
Hatton N, Smith D. Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education 1995;11:33–49. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(94)00012-U
125
Leijen Ä, Allas R, Toom A, et al. Guided Reflection for Supporting the Development of Student Teachers’ Practical Knowledge. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014;112:314–22. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1170
126
Potter C. Leadership development: an applied comparison of Gibbs’ Reflective Cycle and Scharmer’s Theory U. Industrial and Commercial Training 2015;47:336–42. doi:10.1108/ICT-03-2015-0024
127
Larrivee B. Transforming Teaching Practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice 2000;1:293–307. doi:10.1080/713693162
128
Toom A, Husu J, Patrikainen S. Student teachers’ patterns of reflection in the context of teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education 2015;38:320–40. doi:10.1080/02619768.2014.943731
129
Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, et al. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Medical Education 2013;47:388–96. doi:10.1111/medu.12127
130
Jyoti Mahantesh Nagmoti. Departing from PowerPoint default mode: Applying Mayer’s multimedia principles for enhanced learning of parasitology. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2017;35. doi:10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_16_251
131
Mavromihales M, Holmes V, Racasan R. Game-based learning in mechanical engineering education: Case study of games-based learning application in computer aided design assembly. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education Published Online First: 21 March 2018. doi:10.1177/0306419018762571
132
HEW KF, LO CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education 2018;18. doi:10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z
133
Baepler P, Walker JD, Driessen M. It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education 2014;78:227–36. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
134
Roach T. Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics. International Review of Economics Education 2014;17:74–84. doi:10.1016/j.iree.2014.08.003
135
Chen K-S, Monrouxe L, Lu Y-H, et al. Academic outcomes of flipped classroom learning: a meta-analysis. Medical Education 2018;52:910–24. doi:10.1111/medu.13616
136
Hu R, Gao H, Ye Y, et al. Effectiveness of flipped classrooms in Chinese baccalaureate nursing education: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2018;79:94–103. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.11.012
137
Issa N, Schuller M, Santacaterina S, et al. Applying multimedia design principles enhances learning in medical education. Medical Education 2011;45:818–26. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.03988.x
138
Issa N, Mayer RE, Schuller M, et al. Teaching for understanding in medical classrooms using multimedia design principles. Medical Education 2013;47:388–96. doi:10.1111/medu.12127
139
Renkl A, Scheiter K. Studying Visual Displays: How to Instructionally Support Learning. Educational Psychology Review 2017;29:599–621. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9340-4
140
Pickering JD. Anatomy drawing screencasts: Enabling flexible learning for medical students. Anatomical Sciences Education 2015;8:249–57. doi:10.1002/ase.1480
141
Lau KHV. Computer-based teaching module design: principles derived from learning theories. Medical Education 2014;48:247–54. doi:10.1111/medu.12357
142
Graafland M, Dankbaar M, Mert A, et al. How to Systematically Assess Serious Games Applied to Health Care. JMIR Serious Games 2014;2. doi:10.2196/games.3825
143
Graafland M, Schraagen JM, Schijven MP. Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training. British Journal of Surgery 2012;99:1322–30. doi:10.1002/bjs.8819
144
Germany R, Mulligan B, Roberts DH. Infusing Theory into the Undergraduate Classics Curriculum: Examples from Haverford College’s Senior Seminar, Translation and Transformation, and History of Literary Theory. Classical World 2015;108:221–42. doi:10.1353/clw.2015.0023
145
Chen C-M, Wu C-H. Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education 2015;80:108–21. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
146
Long T, Logan J, Waugh M. Students’ Perceptions of the Value of Using Videos as a Pre-class Learning Experience in the Flipped Classroom. TechTrends 2016;60:245–52. doi:10.1007/s11528-016-0045-4
147
Michaelson LK. Designing Effective Group Activities: Lessons for Classroom Teaching and Faculty Development. 1997.http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1384&context=podimproveacad
148
Balslev T, Rasmussen AB, Skajaa T, et al. Combining bimodal presentation schemes and buzz groups improves clinical reasoning and learning at morning report. Medical Teacher 2015;37:759–66. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.986445
149
Katyal, R. Enhancing student’s learning by introducing various interactive teaching-learning methods in large group. International journal of biomedical and advance research Published Online First: 2016.http://wt3cf4et2l.scholar.serialssolutions.com/?sid=google&auinit=R&aulast=Katyal&atitle=Enhancing+student%E2%80%99s+learning+by+introducing+various+interactive+teaching-learning+methods+in+large+group&title=International+journal+of+biomedical+and+advance+research&volume=7&issue=8&date=2016&spage=363&issn=2229-3809
150
Posel N, Mcgee JB, Fleiszer DM. Twelve tips to support the development of clinical reasoning skills using virtual patient cases. Medical Teacher 2015;37:813–8. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.993951
151
Cohen DA, Newman LR, Fishman LN. Twelve tips on writing a discussion case that facilitates teaching and engages learners. Medical Teacher 2017;39:147–52. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1266315
152
Imai PH, Kresyman S, Asadoorian J. Factors Influencing Dental Educators As They Develop Problem‐Based Learning Cases. Journal of Dental Education 2016;80:731–40. doi:10.1002/j.0022-0337.2016.80.6.tb06136.x
153
Wang J, Ni H, Rui Y, et al. A WebGIS-based teaching assistant system for geography field practice (TASGFP). British Journal of Educational Technology 2016;47:279–93. doi:10.1111/bjet.12231
154
Pawson E, Fournier E, Haigh M, et al. Problem-based Learning in Geography: Towards a Critical Assessment of its Purposes, Benefits and Risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 2006;30:103–16. doi:10.1080/03098260500499709
155
Pickering JD, Joynes VCT. A holistic model for evaluating the impact of individual technology-enhanced learning resources. Medical Teacher 2016;38:1242–7. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1210112
156
Duffy RM, Guerandel A, Casey P, et al. Experiences of Using Prezi in Psychiatry Teaching. Academic Psychiatry 2015;39:615–9. doi:10.1007/s40596-014-0204-x
157
Kirsten Zimbardi. Using Inquiry-based Practicals to Promote Students’ Critical Evaluation of the Scientific Literature and Maturation of their Understanding of the Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education (formerly CAL-laborate International) 2016;23.https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/10658
158
Alexandra Yeung. Invigorating science practicals using an inquiry orientated pedagogical tool. Proceedings of The Australian Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (formerly UniServe Science Conference) Published Online First: 2015.https://openjournals.library.sydney.edu.au/index.php/IISME/article/view/9105
159
Reid S, Shapiro L, Louw G. How Haptics and Drawing Enhance the Learning of Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education Published Online First: 14 August 2018. doi:10.1002/ase.1807
160
Cho D, Cosimini M, Espinoza J. Podcasting in medical education: a review of the literature. Korean Journal of Medical Education 2017;29:229–39. doi:10.3946/kjme.2017.69
161
Davies C. Learning and Teaching in Laboratories: An Engineering Subject Centre Guide. 2008.https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/learning-teaching-labs.pdf
162
Kreber C. The university and its disciplines: teaching and learning within and beyond disciplinary boundaries. New York: : Routledge 2008. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9780203892596&uid=^u
163
Becher T. Academic tribes and territories: intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Buckingham: : Society for Research into Higher Education 1989.
164
Shulman LS. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus 2005;134:52–9. doi:10.1162/0011526054622015
165
Gurung RAR, Chick NL, Haynie A. Exploring signature pedagogies: approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of mind. 1st ed. Sterling, Va: : Stylus 2009. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=253660
166
Nancy L. Chick, Aeron Haynie, Regan A. R. Gurung. Exploring more signature pedagogies. Sterling, Va: : Stylus Pub. 2012.
167
Middendorf J, Pace D. Decoding the disciplines: A model for helping students learn disciplinary ways of thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2004;2004:1–12. doi:10.1002/tl.142
168
Jessop T, Maleckar B. The influence of disciplinary assessment patterns on student learning: a comparative study. Studies in Higher Education 2016;41:696–711. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.943170
169
Land R, Meyer JHF, Flanagan MT, editors. Threshold concepts in practice. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: : Sense Publishers 2016.
170
Ottewill R, McFarlane BJ. Effective learning & teaching in business & management. London: : Kogan Page 2001.
171
Martensson P, Bild M, Nilsson K. Teaching and learning at business schools: transforming business education. Aldershot, England: : Gower 2008.
172
Findlay-Thompson, Sandi. Evaluation of a Flipped Classroom in an Undergraduate Business Course. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2331035
173
Eckmann J. Law School Teaching: Linking Learning with Law Practice. Legal education review 2004;:257–68.http://wt3cf4et2l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Law+School+Teaching%3A+Linking+Learning+with+Law+Practice&rft.jtitle=Legal+Education+Review&rft.au=Eckmann%2C+James+K&rft.date=2004&rft.issn=1033-2839&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=257&rft.epage=268&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=894780580128516&paramdict=en-US
174
Burridge R, Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (Great Britain). Effective learning & teaching in law. London: : Kogan Page 2002.
175
Klink B van, Vries URMTh de, editors. Academic learning in law: theoretical positions, teaching experiments and learning experiences. Cheltenham, UK: : Edward Elgar Publishing 2016.
176
Bamford D. Learning the ‘How’ of the Law: Teaching Procedure and Legal Education. Osgoode Hall law journal (1960) Published Online First: 10AD.http://wt3cf4et2l.search.serialssolutions.com/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning+the+%27How%27+of+the+Law%3A+Teaching+Procedure+and+Legal+Education&rft.jtitle=Osgoode+Hall+Law+Journal&rft.au=David+Bamford&rft.au=Trevor+C+W+Farrow&rft.au=Michael+Karayanni&rft.au=Erik+S+Knutsen&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.pub=Osgoode+Hall+Law+School+of+York+University&rft.issn=0030-6185&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.externalDocID=3325608141&paramdict=en-US
177
Knights B. Intelligence and Interrogation: The identity of the English student. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2005;4:33–52. doi:10.1177/1474022205048757
178
Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. doi:10.1177/1474022216628303#
179
Alder E. Becoming a student of English: Students’ experiences of transition into the first year. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2018;17:185–203. doi:10.1177/1474022216628303
180
Milthorpe N, Clarke R, Fletcher L, et al. Blended English: Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in English literary studies. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2018;17:345–65. doi:10.1177/1474022217722140
181
Cunningham C. Teaching and learning French – A tale of desire in the humanities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2017;16:127–40. doi:10.1177/1474022215599165
182
Dörnyei Z, Malderez A. Group dynamics and foreign language teaching. System 1997;25:65–81. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061-9
183
Effective Learning and Teaching in Modern Languages. 1st ed. Taylor & Francis Group 2004. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=214776
184
Calder L. Uncoverage: Toward a Signature Pedagogy for the History Survey. Journal of American History 2006;92:1358–70. doi:10.2307/4485896
185
Gannon K. Getting Medieval with Team-Based Learning � The Tattooed Professor. http://www.thetattooedprof.com/archives/449
186
Middendorf J, Mickute J, Saunders T, et al. What’s feeling got to do with it? Decoding emotional bottlenecks in the history classroom. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2015;14:166–80. doi:10.1177/1474022214552655
187
Booth A, Ludvigsson D. Tuning history. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education Published Online First: 9 January 2017. doi:10.1177/1474022216686507
188
Geoff Timmins, Keith Vernon, and Christine Kinealy. Teaching and Learning History. 1st ed. SAGE Publications 2009. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=456719
189
Alan Booth. Teaching History at University : Enhancing Learning and Understanding. Routledge 2013. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=1517699
190
Fyfe A. Uncomfortable departments: British historians of science and the importance of disciplinary communities. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2015;14:194–205. doi:10.1177/1474022214549438
191
Poletti A, Seaboyer J, Kennedy R, et al. The affects of not reading: Hating characters, being bored, feeling stupid. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 2016;15:231–47. doi:10.1177/1474022214556898
192
Reflective Practice in Geography Teaching. 1st ed. SAGE Publications 2000. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=334515
193
Kinchin IM, Francis RA. Mapping pedagogic frailty in geography education: a framed autoethnographic case study. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 2017;41:56–74. doi:10.1080/03098265.2016.1241988
194
Pawson E, Fournier E, Haigh M, et al. Problem-based Learning in Geography: Towards a Critical Assessment of its Purposes, Benefits and Risks. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 2006;30:103–16. doi:10.1080/03098260500499709
195
Journal of Geography in Higher Education: Vol 42, No 1. https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjgh20/current
196
Kahn PB, Kyle J, Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education (Great Britain). Effective learning and teaching in mathematics and its applications. London: : Kogan Page 2002.
197
Lo CK, Hew KF, Chen G. Toward a set of design principles for mathematics flipped classrooms: A synthesis of research in mathematics education. Educational Research Review 2017;22:50–73. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.002
198
HERSAM MC, LUNA M, LIGHT G. Implementation of Interdisciplinary Group Learning and Peer Assessment in a Nanotechnology Engineering Course. Journal of Engineering Education 2004;93:49–57. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00787.x
199
Holmes NG, Wieman CE. Introductory physics labs: We can do better. Physics Today 2018;71:38–45. doi:10.1063/PT.3.3816
200
Arthur P, Ludwig M, Castelli J, et al. Prepare, Do, Review: A skills-based approach for laboratory practical classes in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2016;44:276–87. doi:10.1002/bmb.20951
201
Cooper MM, Stowe RL. Chemistry Education Research—From Personal Empiricism to Evidence, Theory, and Informed Practice. Chemical Reviews 2018;118:6053–87. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00020
202
Bill Lucas. Thinking Like an Engineer: Using Engineering Habits of Mind and Signature Pedagogies to Redesign Engineering Education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP). 2016;6:4–13.http://journals.sfu.ca/onlinejour/index.php/i-jep/article/view/5366
203
Dolan EL. Undergraduate research as curriculum. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2017;45:293–8. doi:10.1002/bmb.21070
204
Santas AJ. Reciprocity within biochemistry and biology service-learning. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2009;37:143–51. doi:10.1002/bmb.20291
205
Young JM, Shepardson DP. Using Q methodology to investigate undergraduate students’ attitudes toward the geosciences. Science Education 2018;102:195–214. doi:10.1002/sce.21320
206
Hanh NV, Hop NH. The effectiveness of the industrial field trip in introduction to engineering: A case study at Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Vietnam. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education Published Online First: 27 April 2018. doi:10.1177/0020720918773050
207
Rubner G. First-year undergraduate teaching of electrical and electronic engineering: innovation and inspiration. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2017;54:281–2. doi:10.1177/0020720917694997
208
Cavalcanti J, Figueredo LF, Ishihara JY, et al. A real-time web-based networked control system education platform. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2018;55:130–41. doi:10.1177/0020720917750952
209
Twigg P, Ponnapalli P, Fowler M. Workshop problem-solving for improved student engagement and increased learning in Engineering Control. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2018;55:120–9. doi:10.1177/0020720918756258
210
Coppens P, Van den Bossche J, De Cock M. Student understanding of phase shifts, frequency and Bode plots. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2017;54:247–61. doi:10.1177/0020720916680373
211
Judge M. Large-scale Laboratory Teaching for 1st Year EEE Undergraduates. International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education 2017;54:164–77. doi:10.1177/0020720916688487
212
Mavromihales M, Holmes V, Racasan R. Game-based learning in mechanical engineering education: Case study of games-based learning application in computer aided design assembly. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education Published Online First: 21 March 2018. doi:10.1177/0306419018762571
213
Heywood J. The asssessment of learning in engineering education: practice and policy. Piscataway, NJ: : IEEE Press 2016. http://catalogue.library.qmul.ac.uk/uhtbin/ezproxy.pl?url=http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?bknumber=7461000
214
Odeh S, McKenna S, Abu-Mulaweh H. A unified first-year engineering design-based learning course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 2017;45:47–58. doi:10.1177/0306419016674508
215
Tian ZF. Teaching and enhancement of critical thinking skills for undergraduate students in a computational fluid dynamics course. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 2017;45:76–88. doi:10.1177/0306419016674133
216
Mariasiu F, Raboca HM. Assessment of extracurricular activities’ effects on automotive engineering education: A cross-national study. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education 2017;45:120–41. doi:10.1177/0306419016674144
217
Kim M, Diong CH, ProQuest (Firm). Biology education for social and sustainable development. Rotterdam: : Sense Publishers 2012. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/gmul-ebooks/detail.action?docID=3034747
218
Letchford J, Corradi H, Day T. A flexible e-learning resource promoting the critical reading of scientific papers for science undergraduates. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2017;45:483–90. doi:10.1002/bmb.21072
219
Cubas Rolim E, Martins de Oliveira J, Dalvi LT, et al. Blog construction as an effective tool in biochemistry active learning. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2017;45:205–15. doi:10.1002/bmb.21028
220
Goff EE, Reindl KM, Johnson C, et al. Variation in external representations as part of the classroom lecture:An investigation of virtual cell animations in introductory photosynthesis instruction*. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2017;45:226–34. doi:10.1002/bmb.21032
221
Eberlein T, Kampmeier J, Minderhout V, et al. Pedagogies of engagement in science. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 2008;36:262–73. doi:10.1002/bmb.20204
222
Thaman R, Dillon S, Saggar S, et al. Promoting active learning in respiratory physiology – Positive student perception and improved outcomes. National Journal of Physiology, Pharmacy and Pharmacology 2013;3:27–34.
223
Cantillon P, Wood D. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. 2nd ed. Chichester: : Wiley-Blackwell 2010. http://ezproxy.library.qmul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=QMUL&isbn=9781444323238&uid=^u
224
McKimm J, Swanick T. Clinical teaching made easy: a practical guide to teaching and learning in clinical settings. London: : Quay 2010.
225
Bleakley A. Pre-registration house officers and ward-based learning: a `new apprenticeship’ model. Medical Education 2002;36:9–15. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01128.x
226
Egan T, Jaye C. Communities of clinical practice: the social organization of clinical learning. Health: 2009;13:107–25. doi:10.1177/1363459308097363
227
Launer J. Managing the threat to reflective writing. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2018;94:314–5. doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135753
228
Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, et al. Teaching professionalism in medical education: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25. Medical Teacher 2013;35:e1252–66. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.789132
229
Rivière E, Saucier D, Lafleur A, et al. Twelve tips for efficient procedural simulation. Medical Teacher 2017;:1–9. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2017.1391375
230
Losco CD, Grant WD, Armson A, et al. Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. Medical Teacher 2017;39:234–43. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1271944
231
Ellaway RH, O’Gorman L, Strasser R, et al. A critical hybrid realist-outcomes systematic review of relationships between medical education programmes and communities: BEME Guide No. 35. Medical Teacher 2016;38:229–45. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1112894
232
Park S, Khan NF, Hampshire M, et al. A BEME systematic review of UK undergraduate medical education in the general practice setting: BEME Guide No. 32. Medical Teacher 2015;37:611–30. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2015.1032918
233
Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, et al. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82. Medical Teacher 2013;35:e1511–30. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.818632
234
Fatmi M, Hartling L, Hillier T, et al. The effectiveness of team-based learning on learning outcomes in health professions education: BEME Guide No. 30. Medical Teacher 2013;35:e1608–24. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2013.849802
235
Braeckman L, ‘t Kint L, Bekaert M, et al. Comparison of two case-based learning conditions with real patients in teaching occupational medicine. Medical Teacher 2014;36:340–6. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2014.887833
236
Merritt C, Munzer BW, Wolff M, et al. Not Another Bedside Lecture: Active Learning Techniques for Clinical Instruction. AEM Education and Training 2018;2:48–50. doi:10.1002/aet2.10069
237
Mac Giolla Phadraig C, Nunn JH, Tornsey O, et al. Does Special Care Dentistry undergraduate teaching improve dental student attitudes towards people with disabilities? European Journal of Dental Education 2015;19:107–12. doi:10.1111/eje.12110
238
Cameron DA, Binnie VI, Sherriff A, et al. Peer assisted learning: teaching dental skills and enhancing graduate attributes. British Dental Journal 2015;219:267–72. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.722
239
Beveridge E. Learning from patients. BMJ 2007;334:s83.2-s84. doi:10.1136/bmj.334.7592.s83-a
240
Gamble Blakey A, Golding C. ‘Of Course They’re Bloody Scared!’ Managing Medical Student Fear to Better Cultivate Thinking. Medical Science Educator 2018;28:165–73. doi:10.1007/s40670-017-0524-z
