1.
Moon, J.A.: The module & programme development handbook: a practical guide to linking levels, learning outcomes & assessment. Kogan Page, London (2002).
2.
John Biggs: Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education. 32, (1996).
3.
Fung, D.: Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. UCL Press (2017). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1qnw8nf.
4.
Carless, D., Salter, D., Yang, M., Lam, J.: Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education. 36, 395–407 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449.
5.
Wanner, T., Palmer, E.: Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 1032–1047 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.
6.
Novakovich, J.: Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blog-mediated peer feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 32, 16–30 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12114.
7.
David Carless: Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education. 69, (2015).
8.
Barton, K.L., Schofield, S.J., McAleer, S., Ajjawi, R.: Translating evidence-based guidelines to improve feedback practices: the interACT case study. BMC Medical Education. 16, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0562-z.
9.
McCarthy, J.: Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education. 18, 127–141 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615.
10.
Brunton, James: Designing and Developing a Programme-Focused Assessment Strategy: A Case Study. Open learning. (2016).
11.
Rapanta, C., Cantoni, L.: Being in the users’ shoes: Anticipating experience while designing online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 45, 765–777 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12102.
12.
Gikandi, J W: Designing and Implementing Peer Formative Feedback within Online Learning Environments. Technology, pedagogy and education. (2016).
13.
Elena Barberà: Designing Online Interaction to Address Disciplinary Competencies: A Cross-Country Comparison of Faculty Perspectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 15, (2014).
14.
John Biggs: Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education. 32, (1996).
15.
Paul Ashwin: Knowledge, curriculum and student understanding in higher education. Higher Education. 67, (2014).
16.
Paxton, M., Frith, V.: Implications of academic literacies research for knowledge making and curriculum design. Higher Education. 67, 171–182 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9675-z.
17.
Bunbury, S.: Disability in higher education – do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum? International Journal of Inclusive Education. 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1503347.
18.
Burrell, Andrew R: Team-Based Curriculum Design as an Agent of Change. Teaching in higher education. (2015).
19.
Lam, B.H., Tsui, K.T.: Curriculum mapping as deliberation – examining the alignment of subject learning outcomes and course curricula. Studies in Higher Education. 41, 1371–1388 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.968539.
20.
Brooman, S: The Student Voice in Higher Education Curriculum Design: Is There Value in Listening? Innovations in education and teaching international. (2015).
21.
Villarroel, V., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., Bruna, C., Herrera-Seda, C.: Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 840–854 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.
22.
Pittaway, S.M., Moss, T.: "Initially, We Were Just Names on a Computer Screen”: Designing Engagement in Online Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 39, (2014). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.10.
23.
Bridges, S., Yiu, C.K.Y., Botelho, M.G.: Design Considerations for an Integrated, Problem-Based Curriculum. Medical Science Educator. 26, 365–373 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0255-6.
24.
Diversifying the Higher-Education Curriculum: Queering the Design and Pedagogy. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion. 34, (2018). https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.34.1.25.
25.
Owston, R., York, D.N.: The nagging question when designing blended courses: Does the proportion of time devoted to online activities matter? The Internet and Higher Education. 36, 22–32 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.001.
26.
Regan A. R. Gurung, Nancy L. Chick, Aeron Haynie: Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits ...
27.
Ferry Boschman, Susan McKenney and Joke Voogt: Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches. Educational Technology Research and Development. 62, (2014).
28.
Carolin Plewa, Victoria Galán-Muros and Todd Davey: Engaging business in curriculum design and delivery: a higher education institution perspective. Higher Education. 70, (2015).
29.
Leonard, Simon N: Using Developmental Evaluation as a Design Thinking Tool for Curriculum Innovation in Professional Higher Education. Higher education research and development. (2016).
30.
Whiley, Dona: Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in First Year Environmental Management Students: A Tale of Curriculum Design, Application and Reflection. Journal of geography in higher education. (2017).
31.
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M.: Qualitative variation in constructive alignment in curriculum design. Higher Education. 67, 141–154 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9701-1.
32.
Ulriksen, L., Holmegaard, H.T., Madsen, L.M.: Making sense of curriculum—the transition into science and engineering university programmes. Higher Education. 73, 423–440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0099-4.
33.
Abdul-Mumin, K.H.: The process of internationalization of the nursing and midwifery curriculum: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today. 46, 139–145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.003.
34.
Tam, M.: Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 22, 158–168 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-09-2011-0059.
35.
Ray Land, Julie Rattray and Peter Vivian: Learning in the liminal space: a semiotic approach to threshold concepts. Higher Education. 67, (2014).
36.
Kathy Luckett and Aditi Hunma: Making gazes explicit: facilitating epistemic access in the Humanities. Higher Education. 67, (2014).
37.
Tassone, V.C., O’Mahony, C., McKenna, E., Eppink, H.J., Wals, A.E.J.: (Re-)designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: a responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education. 76, 337–352 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0211-4.
38.
Kate O’Connor: MOOCs, institutional policy and change dynamics in higher education. Higher Education. 68, (2014).
39.
Crawford, I., Wang, Z.: The impact of individual factors on the academic attainment of Chinese and UK students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 40, 902–920 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.851182.
40.
Fan, S.-C., Yu, K.-C.: How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 27, 107–129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x.
41.
Matheson, Ruth: Creating Belonging and Transformation through the Adoption of Flexible Pedagogies in Masters Level International Business Management Students. Teaching in higher education. (2017).
42.
Stewart, Victoria: Developing a Postgraduate Work-Based Curriculum Using an Intervention Mapping Approach. Studies in continuing education. (2016).
43.
Powell, P., Walsh, A.: Whose curriculum is it anyway? Stakeholder salience in the context of Degree Apprenticeships. Higher Education Quarterly. 72, 90–106 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12149.
44.
Backenroth, Ofra Arieli: ‘From the Intuitive to the Intentional’: Designing a Constructivist Online Course. Religious education. (2017).
45.
Walker, R., Handley, Z.: Designing for learner engagement with computer-based testing. Research in Learning Technology. 24, (2016). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30083.
46.
Rasi, P., Vuojärvi, H.: Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. 49, 292–304 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12587.
47.
Steen-Utheim, A., Hopfenbeck, T.N.: To do or not to do with feedback. A study of undergraduate students’ engagement and use of feedback within a portfolio assessment design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44, 80–96 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1476669.
48.
Denton, P., Rowe, P.: Using statement banks to return online feedback: limitations of the transmission approach in a credit-bearing assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 40, 1095–1103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.970124.
49.
Yuan, Jiangmei: Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies. Journal of educational computing research. (2015).
50.
Huisman, Bart: Peer Feedback on College Students’ Writing: Exploring the Relation between Students’ Ability Match, Feedback Quality and Essay Performance. Higher education research and development. (2017).
51.
Cockett, A., Jackson, C.: The use of assessment rubrics to enhance feedback in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today. 69, 8–13 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022.
52.
Laurillard, D., Kennedy, E., Charlton, P., Wild, J., Dimakopoulos, D.: Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology. 49, 1044–1058 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12697.
53.
Brad, Stappenbelt: ’The effectiveness of the teaching-research nexus in facilitating student learning. Engineering Education. (2013).
54.
Clifford, Valerie: Designing an Internationationalised Curriculum for Higher Education: Embracing the Local and the Global Citizen. Higher education research and development. (2017).
55.
Hofmeyer, A., Sheingold, B.H., Klopper, H.C., Warland, J.: Leadership In Learning And Teaching In Higher Education: Perspectives Of Academics In Non-Formal Leadership Roles. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER). 8, (2015). https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i3.9348.
56.
Horey, D., Fortune, T., Nicolacopoulos, T., Kashima, E., Mathisen, B.: Global Citizenship and Higher Education: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Studies in International Education. 22, 472–492 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318786443.
57.
Hebdon, Sharon: Embedding Support for Students Transitioning into Higher Education: Evaluation of a New Model. The international journal of training research. (2015).
58.
Heron, M.: Pedagogic practices to support international students in seminar discussions. Higher Education Research & Development. 1–14 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1512954.
59.
Schmid, Megan E: Promoting Student Academic Achievement through Faculty Development about Inclusive Teaching. Change (New Rochelle, N.Y.). (2016).
60.
Hughes, Annie: Exploring Normative Whiteness: Ensuring Inclusive Pedagogic Practice in Undergraduate Fieldwork Teaching and Learning. Journal of geography in higher education. (2016).
61.
Rojas Pernia, S., Haya Salmón, I., Susinos Rada, T.: GROWING STUDENT VOICE IN CURRICULUM DECISIONS AT THE UNIVERSITY. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 16, 563–567 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12186.
62.
Dewsbury, B.M.: On faculty development of STEM inclusive teaching practices. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 364, (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx179.
63.
Lozano, A.: Breaking the Black/White Binary in Higher Education Leadership. About Campus. 21, 27–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21276.
64.
Suleman, F.: The employability skills of higher education graduates: insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education. 76, 263–278 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0.
65.
Prysor, D., Henley, A.: Boundary spanning in higher education leadership: identifying boundaries and practices in a British university. Studies in Higher Education. 43, 2210–2225 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1318364.
66.
Brabazon, T., Schulz, S.: Braving the bull: women, mentoring and leadership in higher education. Gender and Education. 1–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1544362.
67.
Tight, Malcolm: Examining the Research/Teaching Nexus. European journal of higher education. (2016).
68.
Mitten, Carolyn: Sustaining a Commitment to Teaching in a Research-Intensive University: What We Learn from Award-Winning Faculty. Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames). (2018).
69.
Slapcoff, Marcy: The Inquiry Network: A model for promoting the teaching-research nexus in higher education. Canadian journal of higher education (1975). (2014).
70.
Weller, S.: Academic practice: developing as a professional in higher education. Sage, London (2016).
71.
Lopes, A., Boyd, P., Andrew, N., Pereira, F.: The research-teaching nexus in nurse and teacher education: contributions of an ecological approach to academic identities in professional fields. Higher Education. 68, 167–183 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9700-2.
72.
Eley, D.S., Wilkinson, D.: Building a teaching-research nexus in a research intensive university: Rejuvenating the recruitment and training of the clinician scientist. Medical Teacher. 37, 174–180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.947937.
73.
Olivares-Donoso, R., Gonzalez, C.: Biology and medicine students’ experiences of the relationship between teaching and research. Higher Education. 76, 849–864 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0241-6.
74.
Hitch, D., Macfarlane, S., Nihill, C.: Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education. 6, (2015). https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v6i1.254.
75.
Gale, Trevor: Socially Inclusive Teaching: Belief, Design, Action as Pedagogic Work. Journal of teacher education. (2017).
76.
Jones, Janice K: Decolonising Research and Teaching Methodologies: A ‘Ninth Moment’ Symphony of Artist-Educator-Researcher Voices. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning. (2015).
77.
Friedman, Jonathan Z: The Global Citizenship Agenda and the Generation of Cosmopolitan Capital in British Higher Education. British journal of sociology of education. (2018).
78.
Aktas, F., Pitts, K., Richards, J.C., Silova, I.: Institutionalizing Global Citizenship. Journal of Studies in International Education. 21, 65–80 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315316669815.
79.
Stein, Sharon: Mapping Global Citizenship. Journal of college and character. (2015).
80.
Pavlin, S., Svetlik, I.: Employability of higher education graduates in Europe. International Journal of Manpower. 35, 418–424 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2013-0104.
81.
Frankham, Jo: Employability and Higher Education: The Follies of the ‘Productivity Challenge’ in the Teaching Excellence Framework. Journal of education policy. (2017).
82.
Rogaten, J., Rienties, B., Sharpe, R., Cross, S., Whitelock, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Littlejohn, A.: Reviewing affective, behavioural and cognitive learning gains in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 1–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1504277.
83.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P.A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.: Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development. 65, 555–575 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.
84.
Emanuela Reale: Challenges in higher education research: the use of quantitative tools in comparative analyses. Higher Education. 67, (2014).
85.
Rump, Markus: Individual Differences in the Effects of Academic Motivation on Higher Education Students’ Intention to Drop Out. European journal of higher education. (2017).
86.
McArdle, Karen: When Practice Takes Precedence: Conceptions of Inquiry and the Link to Ethical Posture. Educational action research. (2015).
87.
Michinov, N., Morice, J., Ferrières, V.: A step further in Peer Instruction: Using the Stepladder technique to improve learning. Computers & Education. 91, 1–13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.007.
88.
Mathers, C.E., Finney, S.J., Hathcoat, J.D.: Student learning in higher education: a longitudinal analysis and faculty discussion. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 1211–1227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1443202.
89.
James, F., Augustin, D.S.: Improving teachers’ pedagogical and instructional practice through action research: potential and problems. Educational Action Research. 26, 333–348 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1332655.
90.
Wells, R.S., Stage, F.K.: Past, Present, and Future of Critical Quantitative Research in Higher Education. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2014, 103–112 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20089.
91.
Solvason, Carla: Researching in School -- Creating a Meaningful School/University Alliance: A Reflection. Educational action research. (2018).
92.
Thompson, Karen D: Considering Interest and Action: Analyzing Types of Questions Explored by Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships. Educational researcher. (2017).
93.
Constable, H.: Universities, supporting schools and practitioner research. Research in Education. 101, 39–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523718763637.
94.
Harlow, Ann: Threshold Concept Theory as an Enabling Constraint: A Facilitated Practitioner Action Research Study. Educational action research. (2017).
95.
Dahlström, Lars: An Autobiographical Narrative towards Critical Practitioner Inquiry and a Counter Hegemonic Southern Network. Journal for critical education policy studies. (2016).
96.
Bhandari, K.: Teaching evaluation practices: An early career practitioner’s reflections. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 20, 27–31 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2017.01.002.
97.
Lochmiller, Chad R: Conceptualizing Practitioner-Scholarship for Educational Leadership Research and Practice. Journal of research on leadership education. (2017).
98.
Kupo, V.L.: Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Student Affairs. New Directions for Student Services. 2014, 89–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20103.
99.
Töytäri, Aija: Higher Education Teachers’ Descriptions of Their Own Learning: A Quantitative Perspective. Higher education research and development. (2017).
100.
Steyn, C., Davies, C., Sambo, A.: Eliciting student feedback for course development: the application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among business research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44, 11–24 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1466266.
101.
Fullana, J., Pallisera, M., Colomer, J., Fernández Peña, R., Pérez-Burriel, M.: Reflective learning in higher education: a qualitative study on students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education. 41, 1008–1022 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.950563.
102.
Santos, J., Figueiredo, A.S., Vieira, M.: Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today. 72, 12–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003.
103.
Kilburn, Daniel: Learning as Researchers and Teachers: The Development of a Pedagogical Culture for Social Science Research Methods? British journal of educational studies. (2014).
104.
Winberg, C., Adendorff, H., Bozalek, V., Conana, H., Pallitt, N., Wolff, K., Olsson, T., Roxå, T.: Learning to teach STEM disciplines in higher education: a critical review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education. 1–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1517735.
105.
Polkinghorne, Martyn: Considering the Marketing of Higher Education: The Role of Student Learning Gain as a Potential Indicator of Teaching Quality. Journal of marketing for higher education. (2017).
106.
Meens, E.E.M., Bakx, A.W.E.A., Klimstra, T.A., Denissen, J.J.A.: The association of identity and motivation with students’ academic achievement in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences. 64, 54–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.006.
107.
Kyndt, E., Donche, V., Coertjens, L., van Daal, T., Gijbels, D., Van Petegem, P.: Does self-efficacy contribute to the development of students’ motivation across the transition from secondary to higher education? European Journal of Psychology of Education. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0389-6.
108.
Reid, A.-M., Brown, J.M., Smith, J.M., Cope, A.C., Jamieson, S.: Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2.
109.
Willis, J.E., Slade, S., Prinsloo, P.: Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development. 64, 881–901 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9463-4.
110.
Sochacka, N.W., Walther, J., Pawley, A.L.: Ethical Validation: Reframing Research Ethics in Engineering Education Research To Improve Research Quality. Journal of Engineering Education. 107, 362–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20222.
