[1]
Abdul-Mumin, K.H. 2016. The process of internationalization of the nursing and midwifery curriculum: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today. 46, (Nov. 2016), 139–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.09.003.
[2]
Aktas, F. et al. 2017. Institutionalizing Global Citizenship. Journal of Studies in International Education. 21, 1 (Feb. 2017), 65–80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315316669815.
[3]
Backenroth, Ofra Arieli 2017. ‘From the Intuitive to the Intentional’: Designing a Constructivist Online Course. Religious education. 5 (2017).
[4]
Barton, K.L. et al. 2016. Translating evidence-based guidelines to improve feedback practices: the interACT case study. BMC Medical Education. 16, 1 (Dec. 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0562-z.
[5]
Bhandari, K. 2017. Teaching evaluation practices: An early career practitioner’s reflections. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 20, (Jun. 2017), 27–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2017.01.002.
[6]
Brabazon, T. and Schulz, S. 2018. Braving the bull: women, mentoring and leadership in higher education. Gender and Education. (Nov. 2018), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2018.1544362.
[7]
Brad, Stappenbelt 2013. ’The effectiveness of the teaching-research nexus in facilitating student learning. Engineering Education. (2013).
[8]
Bridges, S. et al. 2016. Design Considerations for an Integrated, Problem-Based Curriculum. Medical Science Educator. 26, 3 (Sep. 2016), 365–373. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-016-0255-6.
[9]
Brooman, S 2015. The Student Voice in Higher Education Curriculum Design: Is There Value in Listening? Innovations in education and teaching international. 6 (2015).
[10]
Brunton, James 2016. Designing and Developing a Programme-Focused Assessment Strategy: A Case Study. Open learning. 2 (2016).
[11]
Bunbury, S. 2018. Disability in higher education – do reasonable adjustments contribute to an inclusive curriculum? International Journal of Inclusive Education. (Aug. 2018), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1503347.
[12]
Burrell, Andrew R 2015. Team-Based Curriculum Design as an Agent of Change. Teaching in higher education. 8 (2015).
[13]
Carless, D. et al. 2011. Developing sustainable feedback practices. Studies in Higher Education. 36, 4 (Jun. 2011), 395–407. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003642449.
[14]
Carolin Plewa, Victoria Galán-Muros and Todd Davey 2015. Engaging business in curriculum design and delivery: a higher education institution perspective. Higher Education. 70, 1 (2015).
[15]
Clifford, Valerie 2017. Designing an Internationationalised Curriculum for Higher Education: Embracing the Local and the Global Citizen. Higher education research and development. 6 (2017).
[16]
Cockett, A. and Jackson, C. 2018. The use of assessment rubrics to enhance feedback in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today. 69, (Oct. 2018), 8–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.022.
[17]
Constable, H. 2018. Universities, supporting schools and practitioner research. Research in Education. 101, 1 (Aug. 2018), 39–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0034523718763637.
[18]
Crawford, I. and Wang, Z. 2015. The impact of individual factors on the academic attainment of Chinese and UK students in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 40, 5 (May 2015), 902–920. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.851182.
[19]
Dahlström, Lars 2016. An Autobiographical Narrative towards Critical Practitioner Inquiry and a Counter Hegemonic Southern Network. Journal for critical education policy studies. 1 (Mar. 2016).
[20]
David Carless 2015. Exploring learning-oriented assessment processes. Higher Education. 69, 6 (2015).
[21]
Denton, P. and Rowe, P. 2015. Using statement banks to return online feedback: limitations of the transmission approach in a credit-bearing assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 40, 8 (Nov. 2015), 1095–1103. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.970124.
[22]
Dewsbury, B.M. 2017. On faculty development of STEM inclusive teaching practices. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 364, 18 (Oct. 2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnx179.
[23]
Elena Barberà 2014. Designing Online Interaction to Address Disciplinary Competencies: A Cross-Country Comparison of Faculty Perspectives. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 15, 2 (2014).
[24]
Eley, D.S. and Wilkinson, D. 2015. Building a teaching-research nexus in a research intensive university: Rejuvenating the recruitment and training of the clinician scientist. Medical Teacher. 37, 2 (Feb. 2015), 174–180. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.947937.
[25]
Emanuela Reale 2014. Challenges in higher education research: the use of quantitative tools in comparative analyses. Higher Education. 67, 4 (2014).
[26]
Fan, S.-C. and Yu, K.-C. 2017. How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 27, 1 (Mar. 2017), 107–129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x.
[27]
Ferry Boschman, Susan McKenney and Joke Voogt 2014. Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches. Educational Technology Research and Development. 62, 4 (2014).
[28]
Frankham, Jo 2017. Employability and Higher Education: The Follies of the ‘Productivity Challenge’ in the Teaching Excellence Framework. Journal of education policy. 5 (2017).
[29]
Friedman, Jonathan Z 2018. The Global Citizenship Agenda and the Generation of Cosmopolitan Capital in British Higher Education. British journal of sociology of education. 4 (2018).
[30]
Fullana, J. et al. 2016. Reflective learning in higher education: a qualitative study on students’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education. 41, 6 (Jun. 2016), 1008–1022. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.950563.
[31]
Fung, D. 2017. Connected Curriculum for Higher Education. UCL Press.
[32]
Gale, Trevor 2017. Socially Inclusive Teaching: Belief, Design, Action as Pedagogic Work. Journal of teacher education. 3 (2017).
[33]
Gikandi, J W 2016. Designing and Implementing Peer Formative Feedback within Online Learning Environments. Technology, pedagogy and education. 2 (2016).
[34]
Harlow, Ann 2017. Threshold Concept Theory as an Enabling Constraint: A Facilitated Practitioner Action Research Study. Educational action research. 3 (2017).
[35]
Hebdon, Sharon 2015. Embedding Support for Students Transitioning into Higher Education: Evaluation of a New Model. The international journal of training research. 2 (2015).
[36]
Heron, M. 2018. Pedagogic practices to support international students in seminar discussions. Higher Education Research & Development. (Aug. 2018), 1–14. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1512954.
[37]
Hitch, D. et al. 2015. Inclusive pedagogy in Australian universities: A review of current policies and professional development activities. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education. 6, 1 (Mar. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5204/intjfyhe.v6i1.254.
[38]
Hofmeyer, A. et al. 2015. Leadership In Learning And Teaching In Higher Education: Perspectives Of Academics In Non-Formal Leadership Roles. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER). 8, 3 (Jul. 2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v8i3.9348.
[39]
Horey, D. et al. 2018. Global Citizenship and Higher Education: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Evidence. Journal of Studies in International Education. 22, 5 (Nov. 2018), 472–492. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318786443.
[40]
Hughes, Annie 2016. Exploring Normative Whiteness: Ensuring Inclusive Pedagogic Practice in Undergraduate Fieldwork Teaching and Learning. Journal of geography in higher education. 3 (2016).
[41]
Huisman, Bart 2017. Peer Feedback on College Students’ Writing: Exploring the Relation between Students’ Ability Match, Feedback Quality and Essay Performance. Higher education research and development. 7 (2017).
[42]
James, F. and Augustin, D.S. 2018. Improving teachers’ pedagogical and instructional practice through action research: potential and problems. Educational Action Research. 26, 2 (Mar. 2018), 333–348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1332655.
[43]
John Biggs 1996. Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education. 32, 3 (1996).
[44]
John Biggs 1996. Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment. Higher Education. 32, 3 (1996).
[45]
Jones, Janice K 2015. Decolonising Research and Teaching Methodologies: A ‘Ninth Moment’ Symphony of Artist-Educator-Researcher Voices. International Journal of Pedagogies & Learning. 2 (2015).
[46]
Kate O’Connor 2014. MOOCs, institutional policy and change dynamics in higher education. Higher Education. 68, 5 (2014).
[47]
Kathy Luckett and Aditi Hunma 2014. Making gazes explicit: facilitating epistemic access in the Humanities. Higher Education. 67, 2 (2014).
[48]
Kilburn, Daniel 2014. Learning as Researchers and Teachers: The Development of a Pedagogical Culture for Social Science Research Methods? British journal of educational studies. 2 (2014).
[49]
Kupo, V.L. 2014. Becoming a Scholar-Practitioner in Student Affairs. New Directions for Student Services. 2014, 147 (Sep. 2014), 89–98. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20103.
[50]
Kyndt, E. et al. 2018. Does self-efficacy contribute to the development of students’ motivation across the transition from secondary to higher education? European Journal of Psychology of Education. (May 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0389-6.
[51]
Lam, B.H. and Tsui, K.T. 2016. Curriculum mapping as deliberation – examining the alignment of subject learning outcomes and course curricula. Studies in Higher Education. 41, 8 (Aug. 2016), 1371–1388. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.968539.
[52]
Laurillard, D. et al. 2018. Using technology to develop teachers as designers of TEL: Evaluating the learning designer. British Journal of Educational Technology. 49, 6 (Nov. 2018), 1044–1058. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12697.
[53]
Leonard, Simon N 2016. Using Developmental Evaluation as a Design Thinking Tool for Curriculum Innovation in Professional Higher Education. Higher education research and development. 2 (2016).
[54]
Lochmiller, Chad R 2017. Conceptualizing Practitioner-Scholarship for Educational Leadership Research and Practice. Journal of research on leadership education. 1 (Apr. 2017).
[55]
Lopes, A. et al. 2014. The research-teaching nexus in nurse and teacher education: contributions of an ecological approach to academic identities in professional fields. Higher Education. 68, 2 (Aug. 2014), 167–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9700-2.
[56]
Lozano, A. 2017. Breaking the Black/White Binary in Higher Education Leadership. About Campus. 21, 6 (Jan. 2017), 27–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.21276.
[57]
Mathers, C.E. et al. 2018. Student learning in higher education: a longitudinal analysis and faculty discussion. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 8 (Nov. 2018), 1211–1227. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1443202.
[58]
Matheson, Ruth 2017. Creating Belonging and Transformation through the Adoption of Flexible Pedagogies in Masters Level International Business Management Students. Teaching in higher education. 1 (2017).
[59]
McArdle, Karen 2015. When Practice Takes Precedence: Conceptions of Inquiry and the Link to Ethical Posture. Educational action research. 1 (2015).
[60]
McCarthy, J. 2017. Enhancing feedback in higher education: Students’ attitudes towards online and in-class formative assessment feedback models. Active Learning in Higher Education. 18, 2 (Jul. 2017), 127–141. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417707615.
[61]
Meens, E.E.M. et al. 2018. The association of identity and motivation with students’ academic achievement in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences. 64, (May 2018), 54–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.04.006.
[62]
Michinov, N. et al. 2015. A step further in Peer Instruction: Using the Stepladder technique to improve learning. Computers & Education. 91, (Dec. 2015), 1–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.007.
[63]
Mitten, Carolyn 2018. Sustaining a Commitment to Teaching in a Research-Intensive University: What We Learn from Award-Winning Faculty. Studies in higher education (Dorchester-on-Thames). 8 (2018).
[64]
Moon, J.A. 2002. The module & programme development handbook: a practical guide to linking levels, learning outcomes & assessment. Kogan Page.
[65]
Novakovich, J. 2016. Fostering critical thinking and reflection through blog-mediated peer feedback. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 32, 1 (Feb. 2016), 16–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12114.
[66]
Olivares-Donoso, R. and Gonzalez, C. 2018. Biology and medicine students’ experiences of the relationship between teaching and research. Higher Education. 76, 5 (Nov. 2018), 849–864. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0241-6.
[67]
Owston, R. and York, D.N. 2018. The nagging question when designing blended courses: Does the proportion of time devoted to online activities matter? The Internet and Higher Education. 36, (Jan. 2018), 22–32. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.09.001.
[68]
Paul Ashwin 2014. Knowledge, curriculum and student understanding in higher education. Higher Education. 67, 2 (2014).
[69]
Pavlin, S. and Svetlik, I. 2014. Employability of higher education graduates in Europe. International Journal of Manpower. 35, 4 (Jul. 2014), 418–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2013-0104.
[70]
Paxton, M. and Frith, V. 2014. Implications of academic literacies research for knowledge making and curriculum design. Higher Education. 67, 2 (Feb. 2014), 171–182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9675-z.
[71]
Pittaway, S.M. and Moss, T. 2014. "Initially, We Were Just Names on a Computer Screen”: Designing Engagement in Online Teacher Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education. 39, 7 (Jan. 2014). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.10.
[72]
Polkinghorne, Martyn 2017. Considering the Marketing of Higher Education: The Role of Student Learning Gain as a Potential Indicator of Teaching Quality. Journal of marketing for higher education. 2 (2017).
[73]
Powell, P. and Walsh, A. 2018. Whose curriculum is it anyway? Stakeholder salience in the context of Degree Apprenticeships. Higher Education Quarterly. 72, 2 (Apr. 2018), 90–106. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12149.
[74]
Prysor, D. and Henley, A. 2018. Boundary spanning in higher education leadership: identifying boundaries and practices in a British university. Studies in Higher Education. 43, 12 (Dec. 2018), 2210–2225. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1318364.
[75]
Rapanta, C. and Cantoni, L. 2014. Being in the users’ shoes: Anticipating experience while designing online courses. British Journal of Educational Technology. 45, 5 (Sep. 2014), 765–777. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12102.
[76]
Rasi, P. and Vuojärvi, H. 2018. Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology. 49, 2 (Mar. 2018), 292–304. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12587.
[77]
Ray Land, Julie Rattray and Peter Vivian 2014. Learning in the liminal space: a semiotic approach to threshold concepts. Higher Education. 67, 2 (2014).
[78]
Regan A. R. Gurung, Nancy L. Chick, Aeron Haynie Exploring Signature Pedagogies: Approaches to Teaching Disciplinary Habits ...
[79]
Reid, A.-M. et al. 2018. Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on Medical Education. (Mar. 2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0412-2.
[80]
Rogaten, J. et al. 2018. Reviewing affective, behavioural and cognitive learning gains in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. (Oct. 2018), 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1504277.
[81]
Rojas Pernia, S. et al. 2016. GROWING STUDENT VOICE IN CURRICULUM DECISIONS AT THE UNIVERSITY. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 16, (Aug. 2016), 563–567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12186.
[82]
Rump, Markus 2017. Individual Differences in the Effects of Academic Motivation on Higher Education Students’ Intention to Drop Out. European journal of higher education. 4 (2017).
[83]
Santos, J. et al. 2019. Innovative pedagogical practices in higher education: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education Today. 72, (Jan. 2019), 12–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.003.
[84]
Schmid, Megan E 2016. Promoting Student Academic Achievement through Faculty Development about Inclusive Teaching. Change (New Rochelle, N.Y.). 5 (2016).
[85]
Slapcoff, Marcy 2014. The Inquiry Network: A model for promoting the teaching-research nexus in higher education. Canadian journal of higher education (1975). 2 (Jun. 2014).
[86]
Sochacka, N.W. et al. 2018. Ethical Validation: Reframing Research Ethics in Engineering Education Research To Improve Research Quality. Journal of Engineering Education. 107, 3 (Jul. 2018), 362–379. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20222.
[87]
Solvason, Carla 2018. Researching in School -- Creating a Meaningful School/University Alliance: A Reflection. Educational action research. 4 (2018).
[88]
Steen-Utheim, A. and Hopfenbeck, T.N. 2019. To do or not to do with feedback. A study of undergraduate students’ engagement and use of feedback within a portfolio assessment design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44, 1 (Jan. 2019), 80–96. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1476669.
[89]
Stein, Sharon 2015. Mapping Global Citizenship. Journal of college and character. 4 (2015).
[90]
Stewart, Victoria 2016. Developing a Postgraduate Work-Based Curriculum Using an Intervention Mapping Approach. Studies in continuing education. 3 (2016).
[91]
Steyn, C. et al. 2019. Eliciting student feedback for course development: the application of a qualitative course evaluation tool among business research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 44, 1 (Jan. 2019), 11–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1466266.
[92]
Suleman, F. 2018. The employability skills of higher education graduates: insights into conceptual frameworks and methodological options. Higher Education. 76, 2 (Aug. 2018), 263–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0207-0.
[93]
Tam, M. 2014. Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education. 22, 2 (Apr. 2014), 158–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-09-2011-0059.
[94]
Tassone, V.C. et al. 2018. (Re-)designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: a responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education. 76, 2 (Aug. 2018), 337–352. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0211-4.
[95]
Thompson, Karen D 2017. Considering Interest and Action: Analyzing Types of Questions Explored by Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships. Educational researcher. 8 (Nov. 2017).
[96]
Tight, Malcolm 2016. Examining the Research/Teaching Nexus. European journal of higher education. 4 (2016).
[97]
Tondeur, J. et al. 2017. Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development. 65, 3 (Jun. 2017), 555–575. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.
[98]
Töytäri, Aija 2017. Higher Education Teachers’ Descriptions of Their Own Learning: A Quantitative Perspective. Higher education research and development. 6 (2017).
[99]
Trigwell, K. and Prosser, M. 2014. Qualitative variation in constructive alignment in curriculum design. Higher Education. 67, 2 (Feb. 2014), 141–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9701-1.
[100]
Ulriksen, L. et al. 2017. Making sense of curriculum—the transition into science and engineering university programmes. Higher Education. 73, 3 (Mar. 2017), 423–440. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0099-4.
[101]
Villarroel, V. et al. 2018. Authentic assessment: creating a blueprint for course design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 5 (Jul. 2018), 840–854. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1412396.
[102]
Walker, R. and Handley, Z. 2016. Designing for learner engagement with computer-based testing. Research in Learning Technology. 24, 1 (Jan. 2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30083.
[103]
Wanner, T. and Palmer, E. 2018. Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 43, 7 (Oct. 2018), 1032–1047. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698.
[104]
Weller, S. 2016. Academic practice: developing as a professional in higher education. Sage.
[105]
Wells, R.S. and Stage, F.K. 2015. Past, Present, and Future of Critical Quantitative Research in Higher Education. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2014, 163 (Mar. 2015), 103–112. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/ir.20089.
[106]
Whiley, Dona 2017. Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in First Year Environmental Management Students: A Tale of Curriculum Design, Application and Reflection. Journal of geography in higher education. 2 (2017).
[107]
Willis, J.E. et al. 2016. Ethical oversight of student data in learning analytics: a typology derived from a cross-continental, cross-institutional perspective. Educational Technology Research and Development. 64, 5 (Oct. 2016), 881–901. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9463-4.
[108]
Winberg, C. et al. 2018. Learning to teach STEM disciplines in higher education: a critical review of the literature. Teaching in Higher Education. (Sep. 2018), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1517735.
[109]
Yuan, Jiangmei 2015. Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies. Journal of educational computing research. 3 (Jun. 2015).
[110]
2018. Diversifying the Higher-Education Curriculum: Queering the Design and Pedagogy. Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion. 34, 1 (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2979/jfemistudreli.34.1.25.
